tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-200703572024-03-13T12:48:07.327-05:00The Commonwealth ReportWhere politics and religion mix. We will discuss the relevant issues of the day that many think about but rarely really think through.Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.comBlogger45125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-53493870201509734602013-05-06T12:02:00.000-05:002013-05-06T12:10:59.747-05:00Supernatural Love<div align="CENTER">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Faith, Hope and Love</span></b></div>
<b><span style="font-size: large;">
</span></b><span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<div align="CENTER">
by William Fisher</div>
<br />
And now these three remain: faith, hope and love.But the greatest of these is love. ~ 1 Cor. 13:13<br />
<br />
When Paul wrote about love in 1 Corinthians 13, he was revealing an eternal truth so powerful that it is the sustaining force of all creation. Most of the time, when we read this chapter, or when someone refers to it, we think of the emotion we call love. But what is revealed here is so much more than that. <br />
<br />
But before we get to what Paul meant about love, it would be useful to explore the first two principles as well to see that they, too, are deeper than we are accustomed to thinking of them.<br />
<br />
Faith is often thought of more like positive thinking than what faith truly is. For example, many people when they say the word "faith" think of something they want to happen in the sense they want a better job, or a new car, new house or even the healing of a disease or infirmity. And, while there is an element of that included in the concept of faith, that is very near the surface. Deeper into the idea of faith lies the certain expectation that the desire has been already fulfilled which thus gives rise to a spirit of thanksgiving instead of a spirit of yearning for the thing or event to maybe arrive one day. <br />
<br />
James 1:5-8 says, "If any of you lacks wisdom, you should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and it will be given to you. But when you ask, you must believe and not doubt, because the one who doubts is like a wave of the sea, blown and tossed by the wind. That person should not expect to receive anything from the Lord. Such a person is double-minded and unstable in all they do." <br />
<br />
Jesus said in Mark 11:22-24, "Have faith in God," Jesus answered. ‘Truly I tell you, if anyone says to this mountain, ‘Go, throw yourself into the sea,’ and does not doubt in their heart but believes that what they say will happen, it will be done for them. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours."<br />
<br />
Over and over again, Scripture tells us that faith is not wishful thinking but a firm conviction that what is believed is a present reality. Jesus says we should "believe that you <b><i>have</i></b><i></i> received it." That kind of faith is not looking forward wishing and hoping that it will happen. That kind of faith is thanking God that it has already happened, even if our eyes cannot see it and our experience does not confirm it. That is true faith that brings God into action on our behalf. It is where we touch the supernatural. It is beyond understanding or knowledge or sight or experience, but it is more real than all of those — it is limitless in it’s scope.<br />
<br />
Then there is hope. Ah, hope. Yes, we all know about hope. We hope things get better. We hope we get that promotion at work. We hope the kids are well. That kind of hope is much like what a child does when he or she asks Santa for something for Christmas. They hope they get it. But that it not the kind of hope Paul is writing about. The word translated "hope" in 1 Corinthians 13 is a Greek word, <em>elpis,</em> which more fully means confident expectation. Few people mean confident expectation when they use the word hope, but that is the meaning of what Paul wrote in this passage. This kind of hope is not limited by circumstances or conditions that surround us. This kind of hope also puts us in touch with the supernatural. It is endless and limitless, and it is certain, confident, and expectant. It is not wishful.<br />
<br />
Finally, there is the greatest of the three: love. All of us have some experience with love, both good and bad in human terms. We have loved and been loved. We may have had our hearts broken by love or for love. But the kind of love Paul is writing about here is God-like love, supernatural love, love that knows no boundaries — endless love. There are, to be sure, poems and songs that have been written about endless love, love forever and ever amen, and so on. But this is greater than all of that. Even that love of the poems and songs is limited by our human capacity to keep it alive. We know somewhere in the depths of our being that it is possible for that endless love to actually end. But supernatural love never ends. What did Paul say? Love always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. Love never fails. This is the force behind the force that created the creation. God is love and it is His love that He put into the creation from the very beginning. Scripture is filled with examples of God’s longsuffering love for His children, even after they rejected Him. He never stops loving.<br />
<br />
Is it possible for humans to have that kind of love? Yes. But it can only be a present reality through faith and hope, and they can only exist in supernatural love. Scripture tells us it is impossible to please God without faith. And it is impossible to have that faith without supernatural hope — that confident expectation of the present reality of the object of our faith. And all of that is made possible because of the supernatural, limitless, unending love that sustains the whole creation and our lives. <br />
<br />
How can we experience that kind of love? The only way to truly experience that kind of love is to surrender. We must be willing to give up self for the new creature God has prepared us to be by the rebirth and regeneration of our spirits through faith in His Son, Jesus Christ. And that means a total surrender. That means giving up envy, boastfulness borne out of selfish pride, elevating ourselves at the expense of others, being offended and holding a grudge for wrongs done to us by others, and by giving up our desire for "getting even" for the hurts heaped upon us by foes, friends, and family. In other words written by Paul found in Colossians 3: 9-10, we must take off our old self with all of its practices and baggage, and put on our new self which is being renewed in knowledge in the image of our Creator. <br />
<br />
This requires living intentionally every day. It requires a daily decision, even moment-by-moment decisions throughout the day to live in our new skin, in our new self that is being transformed constantly into the image of our Father. When we decide to live this way, we will learn to love supernaturally, and it will transform out lives into supernatural lives.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-38156438788391655242012-05-28T15:27:00.000-05:002012-07-21T09:19:23.556-05:00Memorial Day 2012<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-lN9cmRLDe8Q/T8PeXmnraBI/AAAAAAAAADs/mLN1Tc_Eq3s/s1600/409508%252520%2528Large%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="286" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-lN9cmRLDe8Q/T8PeXmnraBI/AAAAAAAAADs/mLN1Tc_Eq3s/s400/409508%252520%2528Large%2529.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<i>by William L. (Bill) Fisher</i><br />
Copyright © 2012. William L. Fisher. All Rights Reserved.<br />
<br />
Today, May 28, 2012, is Memorial Day in the US. Sadly, for most Americans, this day represents a day to skip work and head to the mall for the “Memorial Day Sales Event.” In 2012, all around the world, special days of significance have been turned into a market place. <br />
<br />
In the Gospels, there is a story of how the Jews in Jerusalem turned a Jewish celebration into an opportunity to set up commercial enterprises right in the Temple Courts. They were exchanging currency for travelers from foreign lands as well as selling animals and birds for sacrifices for the ceremony they were celebrating. So, it’s nothing new that people, or even whole societies forget the significance of the special days and get seduced into entering the basest treatment of such a holy day by commercializing it. In the Gospel, Jesus reminded them of the significance of the day and ran the merchants out of the Temple.<br />
<br />
Today is a day set aside in the US to remember those men and women who gave the ultimate sacrifice of dying for the cause that is at the core and center of what America stands for — the cause of liberty and freedom. So, today, I wish to remind us all of the true meaning of Memorial Day. <br />
<br />
Today, there are sons and daughters of these brave patriots who died to set men free who are alive and remembering their fathers and mothers. Some of these sons and daughters are hardly old enough to even understand what this all means. At the same time, some of these sons and daughters are themselves old and nearing the time when they too will cross over from this life to the next. Whatever their age, can’t we for just a little while today, remember their loved ones and them? Are we so self-centered and self-absorbed that we can’t stop for a moment and remember? <br />
<br />
I read an article today about Vietnam Vets. There was to be a ceremony in Washington, DC to commemorate their service and sacrifice. Following the article, there were comments from readers of this story, and one really stood out. This person virtually shouted his disdain for the Viet Nam war and anyone who had anything at all to do with it. It reminded me of the 60's and the war protesters. I am one of those forgotten Vietnam vets, and I find it amazing that after all this time some people in the US still hold onto their misguided and uninformed hatred for those of us who went to that war. Some of us volunteered (I did), but many did not. They just answered the call of the draft and went, and some died. That’s what patriots do.<br />
<br />
Forgive me if I have little sympathy for the person who spewed forth his venomous diatribe against that war and those of us who went to serve our country. It was, after all, our country we went to serve. Yes, I know, it was way across the sea in a foreign land — just like so many other wars before and since. Communism was spreading, and the US was its chief enemy. It was our duty to stop its spread wherever it arose. Does that sound naive? Maybe, but for those of who were living then, it was reality.<br />
<br />
For example, in 1962, there was a major event in American. It was called the Cuban Missile Crises. I was a sophomore in college, and the Cuban Missile Crises was very real to me and just about every other male in college but not in the military. We didn’t know if we were about to go to war with Russia, but if we did we knew it would be World War III, and we expected nuclear weapons would be used to annihilate millions. Every day, I lived with the thought that I may never finish college, may never live to be married and have a family, may never get to live out my dreams. Communism was at our back door in Cuba and threatening our very existence.<br />
<br />
Then there was the build up in Vietnam that followed communist North Vietnam’s secret plan to take over non-communist South Vietnam, with whom the US had developed a favorable relationship. It took the US 5 years to get what was going on and to fully engage, and that 5 years costs us dearly. There were several mistakes that cost us dearly, and perhaps the worst mistake was how the main stream media wrongly reported the outcome of the Tet Offensive in early 1968. The reports in the US were that we had suffered a terrible defeat. The truth was we had attained a crushing victory that had pushed the North Vietnamese to point of reconsidering their war effort. If the US had pressed the battle against the North, the war would probably have been over in six months. But, our leaders then, as now, were weak and unprepared for battle.<br />
<br />
Be that as it may, the actual people who slogged through the swamps and jungles of Southeast Asia showed up every day to do their job. And they did it with remarkable courage and competence. If you’ve never been in the situation of actual combat, you cannot possibly imagine just how creative and innovative the average soldier (I include Marines, Sailors, at al) can become when he is fighting for his life and the life of the people around him. It becomes very personal and very focused. I’ve seen people do things that they never ever thought of, much less planned out with great effort. They just responded to a situation and survived. They deserve our appreciation, regardless of what one may think of a particular war.<br />
<br />
Today, is a day to remember those who did not survive. They gave the greatest measure of devotion known to mankind. They gave their lives so our lives can continue, so we can live on and follow our dreams. May we not screw this up by being ungrateful. They deserve better<br />
<br />
For an experience of a lifetime, watch this movie about one of these who died for his country and how he was treated.<br />
<h2>
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Taking-Chance-Kevin-Bacon/dp/B001TOD6N4/ref=sr_1_1?s=movies-tv&ie=UTF8&qid=1338239360&sr=1-1"><span style="color: cyan;">Taking Chance</span></a></h2>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-iq9Q13L-cRk/T8PrO6EqgcI/AAAAAAAAAD8/xHPha33naEg/s1600/Taking%2BChance.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="300" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-iq9Q13L-cRk/T8PrO6EqgcI/AAAAAAAAAD8/xHPha33naEg/s400/Taking%2BChance.jpg" width="300" /></a></div>Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-77712295453364042032012-04-10T07:41:00.000-05:002012-04-10T07:41:32.780-05:00He Is Risen - 2012<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-NjHzhYSu8IM/T4Qp32gDccI/AAAAAAAAADg/IklZ6cFXiXg/s1600/Resurrection%2Bof%2BChrist%2B-%2BMichael%2BAngelo" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left:1em; margin-right:1em"><img border="0" height="238" width="400" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-NjHzhYSu8IM/T4Qp32gDccI/AAAAAAAAADg/IklZ6cFXiXg/s400/Resurrection%2Bof%2BChrist%2B-%2BMichael%2BAngelo" /></a></div><br />
He is Risen!<br />
Easter 2012 Meditation<br />
Copyright © 2011, 2012 by Bill Fisher. All Rights Reserved<br />
<br />
What is Easter? Some say it is the most holy day of the year. Others say it is one of the holy days on the church calendar. Still others say it is a secular holiday commemorating the arrival of Spring. Some Christians refuse to celebrate Easter because they believe it is associated with a Greek goddess of fertility rite celebrated by the Romans and adapted by the church in error. Whatever it is, it is important because it has such a wide influence throughout the world. Is that influence good? Yes, I think it is. On this day, the world is reminded that the Son of God died for the sin of the world, even if the world doesn’t quite get it.<br />
<br />
I am struck by the power of Easter — the power of the resurrection itself. The stone was rolled away from the tomb, not so that our Lord could get out — clearly solid walls could no longer contain him — but so his disciples could see in and know that he had risen from the dead. That huge stone had to be rolled away, and there was no man who could do it. But the power of the resurrection of Jesus came from within the tomb. That was the same power that moved over the chaos of the void before creation when God spoke and the worlds were created. <br />
<br />
Think about this. At the creation, everything happened because God spoke a word. Did God speak at the resurrection? Did he, like Jesus at the raising of Lazarus, say, “Jesus, come forth?” Jesus is the Word. John tells us that all that was created was created through him, the Word. So think about this: Jesus, the Word, spoke his resurrection into being before he died as he told his disciples that on the third day he would be raised from the dead. He had already spoken the Word of his resurrection before he died on the cross. <br />
<br />
This Easter, our nation is faced with some mighty challenges. Our government is spending more than it has. Our leaders seem incapable of figuring out a solution. The price of gasoline is rising. Thousands of people have lost their jobs and homes. The government we have been depending on is running out of answers. People are getting worried about their future. Hope does not burn brightly in their breasts this Easter morning.<br />
<br />
But we need not fear. Read Psalm 91:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>5 You will not fear the terror of night, <br />
nor the arrow that flies by day, <br />
6 nor the pestilence that stalks in the darkness, <br />
nor the plague that destroys at midday. <br />
7 A thousand may fall at your side, <br />
ten thousand at your right hand, <br />
but it will not come near you. <br />
8 You will only observe with your eyes <br />
and see the punishment of the wicked. </blockquote><br />
The power of God is able to deliver us from this mess we find ourselves in. Has man ever made such a mess of things that God could not untangle it? No, and man never will, because man is simply not smart enough, powerful enough, or clever enough. <br />
<br />
Starting sometime in the late 19th Century and the early 20th Century, Europeans and Americans began to think they had found a better way of doing things. The old, traditional ways simply would no longer serve the needs of the modern 20th Century world. So, as humankind is wont to do, they decided they could build a better world than the one God built and the one He maintained for their enjoyment. They reasoned among themselves that, in their view, everything was subject to change. Therefore, change must be an immutable law of sorts that they needed to harness for their own purposes. Then they decided that absolute truth, the kind God dispenses, was an obstacle to this new-found change principle, so they would need an alternative. Moral relativism was their solution. This led them to turn everything upside down, calling what had been accepted truth throughout the eons of time to now be passe and of no benefit. They threw out centuries of understanding and reliance on the beneficence of their Creator and replaced it with the beneficence of the State, which, of course, they controlled.<br />
<br />
In the words of Stan Laurel “Well, here's another nice mess you've gotten me into!” The problem is we have gotten ourselves in this mess by abandoning the truth for a lie. We have reached a point where now, finally, we are beginning to see that politicians are not to be trusted. If the polls are to be believed, the American people have become very distrustful of government and those who run it. Good! But what are they putting in the place of government as the object of their trust? Certainly not God. Church attendance is down. Religion, especially Christianity, is waning as influence over the morals of the nation. <br />
<br />
The answer is right there in front of us. It is Easter! The resurrection power of Jesus Christ to resurrect us from our miserable attempts to become our own gods and rule our own lives. As Jeremiah writes in Jer. 10:23, “O LORD, I know the way of man is not in himself; It is not in man who walks to direct his own steps. “ We need God to direct our path, to show us the way out of the mess we are in. We have no power in ourselves that we should be gods. We are weak compared to the power of the creation, much less the power of the one who created it.<br />
<br />
Have you ever stood in the surf and felt the awesome power of the water as it rolls in? Have you ever seen the power of a flood as it washes away everything in its path? Or the fury of a forest fire burning out of control? Or felt the earth tremble and shake during an earthquake? During Holy Week this year of 2012, 14 tornadoes hit the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex near where I live with such power that 18-wheeler trailers were seen being tossed 200 feet into the air and slung about like dust.. Our power, even in the machines and inventions of our most capable geniuses, pale into insignificance when compared to the power of nature and of nature’s God. And, yet, mankind still keeps believing he can come up with a better plan. How arrogant!<br />
<br />
So, this Easter, I chose to focus on the Power of Easter. “He is Risen” is a powerful statement, and it is my power source. No matter what my eyes see in the coming year, I will remember “He is Risen.” No matter how large the challenge, how deep the hole, or how hopeless life appears, I will remember “He is Risen.” No matter what the world may throw at me, I will remember “HE IS RISEN!!!”<br />
<br />
May this Easter be a breakthrough time for all of us as we ponder and digest the Power of Easter and as we confess “He is Risen” in our life anew this Easter.Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-17792169413875419352012-04-06T09:53:00.000-05:002012-04-06T09:53:28.780-05:00good Friday<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/--Ntky0zTgWw/T38DMNo_LyI/AAAAAAAAADU/wCStOTwjM7U/s1600/goodfriday.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear:left; float:left;margin-right:1em; margin-bottom:1em"><img border="0" height="355" width="400" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/--Ntky0zTgWw/T38DMNo_LyI/AAAAAAAAADU/wCStOTwjM7U/s400/goodfriday.jpg" /></a></div><br />
<br />
What could possibly be good about a Friday over 2,000 years ago when Jesus of Nazareth was crucified on a Roman cross? How could death, and a terribly painful one at that, be good? Where did the idea come from to call this day in Holy Week “good?” The source is unclear. Some have suggested it is a corruption of the English phrase “God’s Friday.” It is the title for this day among English and Dutch speaking people, but few others. <br />
<br />
The liturgical title for this day in the Western church was “Friday of Preparation,” similar to what the Jews called Friday — paraskeue (getting ready) or “day of preparation.” Other names used are “Holy Friday” among the Latin nations, “Great Friday” among the Slavic countries, “Friday of Mourning” in Germany, “Long Friday” in Norway, and “Holy Friday” among Hispanics.<br />
<br />
Good Friday is good because, on this day God reconciled the world to himself in Christ. For us it is “good” because we look back at the crucifixion through the lens of Easter!<br />
<br />
This is the starkest day of the Christian year. There are no adornments in the church. No gold is in sight. The Table is bare. No Bible is on the pulpit. Nothing but a simple wooden cross is present. Black is the theme chosen by many for this day, but the overwhelming consensus has been to use no color at all. In many churches, there is no music today, and in those where music is played, it is simple with only a keyboard, a piano, or a guitar. The ministers enter in silence. There are no choirs and no special music. Holy Communion is not to be offered at this service, nor at any time again until the Great Vigil or Easter Sunday morning. The service is ended without a benediction, but with a simple dismissal prayer and all depart in silence. This is the prayer from the Book of Common Prayer (page 282):<br />
<br />
Lord Jesus Christ, Son of the living God, we pray you to set your passion, cross, and death between your judgment and our souls, now and in the hour of our death. Give mercy and grace to the living; pardon and rest to the dead; to your holy Church peace and concord; and to us sinners everlasting life and glory; for with the Father and Holy Spirit you live and reign, one God, now and for ever. Amen,Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-74003841504887617012012-01-04T21:36:00.000-06:002012-01-04T21:36:48.968-06:00Need To Stay FocusedThe Iowa Caucus was last night, and the blogs went ballistic about the outcome. The media that reported on it went all out. This morning everyone was abuzz about whether Perry will stay in or quit, whether Bachmann will quit now. As the day went along, it seemed clear that Bachmann would quit and Perry would stay in. All of this is interesting, but the Iowa Caucus is not the election.<br />
<br />
While the outcome of the race for President is important, indeed this is one of the most critical elections maybe ever, it is not the only race that is crucial to the future of America. Regardless of whomever is elected President, we absolutely must have a House and Senate that will protect the rights of all the people, not just the underdog, and which understands their highest prriority is to promote a free-market economy with a minium of government regulation and involvment. We need a Congress that respects the Constitution and the limitations imposed upon it by that Constitution. <br />
<br />
We have an opportunity to take control of the Senate, and perhaps even an opportunity to elect a veto-proof majority or one that is close enough with a few right thinking Democrats to override a veto. Clearly, we must retain the majority in the House and even increase that majority. If we do these two things, we win regardless of which Republican is the next President, and especially if O should win a second term. Don’t get me wrong. I think O being elected to a second term would be terrible. I can think of nothing worse than having to endure him for another four years. But, we must remain focused on our goal. Our goal is to return our country to the one we started out with and not the one that the socialist agenda has been building for the last 100 years.<br />
<br />
This mess didn’t just happen when GWB was President, or Clinton, or GHWB, or any of the Presidents of recent vintage. This has been building since the late 19th century and has been accelerating since the early 20th centuiry. Roosevelt’s New Deal was not the beginnnig but the culmination of a long record of socialist influence in high places in Europe and America. Most of us have known nothing but a gradual encroachment of socialism into our system of government for all of our lives.<br />
<br />
It is time we got focused on the big picture. Iowa is not even a true blip on the radar screen. No delegates were commited last night to any candidate. In fact, delegates from Iowa won’t be selected until after almost all of the other true primaries. We have fallen victim to the mainstream media propoganda machine that Iowa matters. The Iowa Caucus system is no different from the usual precinct convention system most of us know in our own states. Delegates are selected at the precinct convention/Iowa caucus to go to the county convention, where delegates will be selected to go to the state convention, where delegates will be selected to go the national convention. Only after this process will delegates from Iowa be committed. <br />
<br />
Watching the coverage last night on both Fox and CNN one had the impression that this was the big one, the election that will determine the Republican nominee. It was not the big one, except in the minds of the media pundits who needed something to do last night.<br />
<br />
Let us stay focused on the truly important outcomes.Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-77509634608415559242011-12-24T08:45:00.004-06:002011-12-24T09:12:33.604-06:00Merry ChristmasThis Christmas I can think of nothing better to post here than beautiful music praising God and our Savior, Jesus Christ. The following comes from a CD by one of my most favorite people, John Michael Talbot. If you don't know of him, please learn about him <a href="http://www.johnmichaeltalbot.com/">here</a> and support his ministry. You will be blessed.<br />
<br />
May this Christmas bring a special blessing to you and your loved ones, and may Christ dwell in you and you in Him.<br />
<br />
Merry Christmas<br />
<br />
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ni6WuAX1fKE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
<br />
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZWMJv1FfVCE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
<br />
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/r64qvxdCm9o" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
<br />
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2e_byLxqK3Y" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
<br />
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/cQbkKTJVSro" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
<br />
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/AQiNUVqqf0o" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
<br />
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1rJmaeB6vb8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
<br />
<i>These songs are by John Michael Talbot from his album, "The Birth Of Jesus" recorded with the National Philharmonic Chamber Orchestra of London, the Ambrosian Men's Choir, and the Junior Boys Choir of Desborough School</i>.Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-24954775538177858412011-11-24T08:32:00.000-06:002011-11-24T08:32:11.614-06:00Thanksgiving Day - 2011<div align="left" class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-1tFqEdVgNjw/Ts5Ro-bnWTI/AAAAAAAAADA/i8xGYcp7zt0/s1600/Thanksgiving.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-1tFqEdVgNjw/Ts5Ro-bnWTI/AAAAAAAAADA/i8xGYcp7zt0/s320/Thanksgiving.jpg" width="229" /></a></div><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div><div><strong>Psalm 100</strong></div></div><em>A psalm. For giving grateful praise. </em><br />
<br />
Shout for joy to the LORD, all the earth. <br />
Worship the LORD with gladness; <br />
come before him with joyful songs. <br />
Know that the LORD is God. <br />
It is he who made us, and we are his; <br />
we are his people, the sheep of his pasture. <br />
Enter his gates with thanksgiving <br />
and his courts with praise; <br />
give thanks to him and praise his name. <br />
For the LORD is good and his love endures forever; <br />
his faithfulness continues through all generations.<br />
<br />
As I thought about what I wanted to say about Thanksgiving day this year, several things came to mind for which I am thankful. For example, my wife heads my list. She has been the greatest blessing in my life — right after the blessing of my redemption in Jesus Christ. I could write a book about how much Gloria means to me, but I will refrain from that today. Next are my children, each of the three of them have blessed me, and continue to bless me, in their own unique, individual ways. And the list goes on and on and on. When we sit down to list those things for which have reason to be thankful, we are often surprised at how many items are on that list. <br />
<br />
Most of us in the US stop our usual activities to celebrate Thanksgiving Day with a feast of turkey, dressing, and all the rest. We eat too much. We share time with family. We take naps after the meal. We don’t engage in the activities that occupy our lives the rest of the time. And that is all a good thing. We should take time out to celebrate our thankfulness. For some it is a rare occasion when they actually say a prayer of thanksgiving to God. <br />
<br />
Then comes the day after. Someone has labeled the Friday after Thanksgiving Day "Black Friday." It wasn’t always called by that name. It seems to me that it has only been in recent years that Black Friday showed up in our vocabulary. Of course, most of us know by now that it refers to the biggest shopping day of the year and the day on which merchants make a lot of money — when their profit and loss column goes into the black of profit instead of the red of loss. <br />
<br />
It seems to me that we Americans have become enslaved so much to the activity of chasing after profit that we have forgotten that the source of our bounty lies not in our commercial activity but in our spiritual activity. In thinking about this, the following scripture came to mind: <br />
<br />
<blockquote>No one can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and Money. (Matthew 6:24)</blockquote><br />
Clearly, our devotion cannot be divided if we wish to be successful at any endeavor. We must firmly decide our priorities and focus our energies on those priorities. Thanksgiving Day is a day set aside to focus on the priorities in our lives for which we are thankful — which are the real reason for what we do and who we are. But is it only for that one day alone that we are willing to set aside the commerce of our lives to focus on the source of our bounty, on the source of the goodness in our lives?<br />
<br />
God clearly spoke to his children about the source of their wealth when he spoke to them as they were entering the promised land:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>You may say to yourself, "My power and the strength of my hands have produced this wealth for me." But remember the LORD your God, for it is he who gives you the ability to produce wealth, and so confirms his covenant, which he swore to your ancestors, as it is today. (Deuteronomy 8:17-18)</blockquote><br />
Thanksgiving Day is not about "wealth" in the ususal sense. It is, however, about bounty in a sense we rarely acknowledge. God’s blessings are new every morning, just as he provided the children with manna during their time in the wilderness. Every day brought more than enough for that day. And it still does. Each day, God provides from His endless bounty to supply all of our needs. In this way, God confirms and establishes His covenant with us. We will never run out of what we need because God never runs out of supply for those needs.<br />
<br />
Those of us who live in the United States of America have a special blessing. This country was founded on the principles and values handed down to us through a long line of Christian patriots who preserved for us the written Word of God along with the wonderful traditions and sacraments of the Christian faith. We are a blessed nation. But, just as God’s children often rebelled against Him in the Old Testament, America is rebelling against God today, turning away from Him and His ways, and doing what is right in his or her own eyes rather than what it right in God’s eyes and abandoning His ways. So, while we are giving thanks for all of our blessings, let us also be vigilant in being good stewards of those blessings so that we remain faithful to the Source of all Blessing and thus continue to walk in the bounty of God’s paths of righteousness.<br />
<br />
So, on this Thanksgiving Day, I pray that all of my family and all of my friends will stop long enough to give God thanks for His endless bounty and gracious mercy to them. As we sit down to our feast today, we will be saying a special "Thank You" to God.<br />
<br />
For those who would like to have a pattern for such a prayer, here is a prayer from the Book of Common Prayer:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Let us give thanks to God our Father for all his gifts so freely bestowed upon us.<br />
For the beauty and wonder of your creation, in earth and sky and sea,<br />
For all that is gracious in the lives of men and women, revealing the image of Christ,<br />
For our daily food and drink, our homes and families, and our friends,<br />
For minds to think, and heart to love, and hands to serve,<br />
For health and strength to work, ans leisure to rest and play,<br />
For the brave and courageous, who are patient in suffering and faithful in adversity,<br />
For all valiant seekers of truth, liberty, and justice,<br />
For the communion of saints, in all times and places,<br />
Above all, we give you thanks for the great mercies and promises given to us in Christ Jesus our Lord;<br />
To him be praise and glory, with you, O Father, and the Holy Spirit, now and for ever. Amen.</blockquote> <br />
And then may we all join in the words of that song:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Give thanks with a grateful heart<br />
Give thanks to the holy one<br />
Give thanks for he's given<br />
Jesus Christ, his son<br />
And now let the weak say I am strong<br />
Let the poor say I am rich<br />
Because of what the lord has done for us <br />
Give Thanks!</blockquote> <br />
<b>Happy Thanksgiving!</b>Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-83919098330606811912011-11-11T15:17:00.001-06:002011-11-11T15:34:27.476-06:00Veterans Day 2011<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ULdZzNjID8k/Tr2OhUJRcsI/AAAAAAAAAC0/FVN_kDgnk2U/s1600/Armistance%2BDay%2B-%2B11-11-1918%2Bat%2BStenay-Meuse%2BFrance.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="315" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ULdZzNjID8k/Tr2OhUJRcsI/AAAAAAAAAC0/FVN_kDgnk2U/s400/Armistance%2BDay%2B-%2B11-11-1918%2Bat%2BStenay-Meuse%2BFrance.jpg" width="360" /></a></div><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Too many of Americans have forgotten the origins of what we call “Veteran’s Day.” It started out being called “Armistice Day” in honor of the end of hostilities in World War I. I suppose this is another example of how we have forgotten the sacraments of our times — things that mean more than just the thing itself. Today, I want to remember what this sacrament means and what it does not mean.<br />
<br />
World War I was, at the time, thought to be the war to end all wars. The same was said for World War II. Of course, neither war was the last war. Scripture tells us there will be wars and rumors of war, but the end is not yet to be. So, it appears to be man’s destiny to continue to experience wars. There are those who cling to a belief that war can be eliminated, usually by mankind simply being kind to each other and respecting each other. That utopian point of view ignores the nature of man and of the world in which man lives. While I may choose to be at peace with my neighbor, try as I may, I cannot force my neighbor to be at peace with me if my neighbor does not wish it. The same is true with nations. <br />
<br />
As a veteran, I can say with great conviction that most veterans, and most soldiers, marines, airmen, and sailors want peace. Most military men and women want peace and not war, but they also understand that there are people and nations in the world that do not share their desire for peace, and the only way for America to be at peace is to be prepared to go to war. Paradox, to be sure, but then there are lot of paradoxes in this world. Even Scripture mentions these “Rules of Opposites.” The one who wants to be first must be last. The one who wants to gain life must lose it. Give and it will be given to you.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong>The History of Veterans Day</strong> </div><br />
The Treaty of Versailles was signed on June 28, 1919, in the Palace of Versailles outside the town of Versailles, France, but the fighting ceased seven months earlier when an armistice, or temporary cessation of hostilities, between the Allied nations and Germany went into effect on the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month. For that reason, November 11, 1918, is generally regarded as the end of “the war to end all wars.”<br />
<br />
In November 1919, President Wilson proclaimed November 11 as the first commemoration of Armistice Day with the following words: "To us in America, the reflections of Armistice Day will be filled with solemn pride in the heroism of those who died in the country’s service and with gratitude for the victory, both because of the thing from which it has freed us and because of the opportunity it has given America to show her sympathy with peace and justice in the councils of the nations…"<br />
<br />
The United States Congress officially recognized the end of World War I when it passed a concurrent resolution on June 4, 1926, with these words:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq"><strong>Whereas</strong> the 11th of November 1918, marked the cessation of the most destructive, sanguinary, and far reaching war in human annals and the resumption by the people of the United States of peaceful relations with other nations, which we hope may never again be severed, and<br />
<br />
<strong>Whereas</strong> it is fitting that the recurring anniversary of this date should be commemorated with thanksgiving and prayer and exercises designed to perpetuate peace through good will and mutual understanding between nations; and<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>Whereas</strong> the legislatures of twenty-seven of our States have already declared November 11 to be a legal holiday: Therefore be it Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), that the President of the United States is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the officials to display the flag of the United States on all Government buildings on November 11 and inviting the people of the United States to observe the day in schools and churches, or other suitable places, with appropriate ceremonies of friendly relations with all other peoples.</blockquote><br />
On May 13, 1938, Congress passed an act making the 11th of November in each year a legal holiday. The day was dubbed “Armistice Day” to honor veterans of World War I. In 1954, after World War II had required the greatest mobilization of soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen in the nation’s history and after American forces had fought aggression in Korea, the 83rd Congress amended the Act of 1938 by changing “Armistice Day” to ‘Veterans Day” With the approval of this legislation (Public Law 380) on June 1, 1954, November 11th became a day to honor American veterans of all wars.<br />
<br />
On October 8, 1954, President Dwight D. Eisenhower issued the first "Veterans Day Proclamation" which stated: "In order to insure proper and widespread observance of this anniversary, all veterans, all veterans' organizations, and the entire citizenry will wish to join hands in the common purpose. Toward this end, I am designating the Administrator of Veterans' Affairs as Chairman of a Veterans Day National Committee, which shall include such other persons as the Chairman may select, and which will coordinate at the national level necessary planning for the observance. I am also requesting the heads of all departments and agencies of the Executive branch of the Government to assist the National Committee in every way possible."<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">T<strong>he Sacrament of Veterans Day</strong></div><br />
The word sacrament is usually defined in terms of its religious or theological meaning, but the word has a meaning in the temporal and secular world as well. In religious terms, a sacrament is an outward and visible sign of an inward grace. In other words, it is something that is tangible in the physical world that reminds us of something that exists in the spiritual world. I am using it in a similar way to apply to a celebration (something tangible in the physical world) that brings to mind something that is more than simply a celebration (something that exists in the spiritual world). Once we think of special days as sacraments, instead of just a day of celebration, those days take on a special or sacramental meaning to us.<br />
<br />
I read a meditation this morning about Veterans Day from a Christian blog that went off into explaining how, while Veterans Day is about honoring our veterans, it is really about honoring all the heroes in our lives, and it used two women, Lois and Eunice, Timothy’s grandmother and mother as examples of this. These women sacrificed to give Timothy an education in the Scriptures so the author of this meditation opined that we should use this day to remember the heroes in our own lives. Well, no, because to do so destroys the sacrament of this day.<br />
<br />
Veterans Day is a special day to pay honor to those who have served the United States, and all of its citizens, by being in the military and defending the foundations of freedom and liberty — the very foundations upon which was built the United States of America. It is not a day to honor all of those who are special in our lives. It is a day to honor those living and dead who sacrificed their lives, or a part of their lives, so that all people can be free. To do otherwise cheapens transforms the sacrament into something it was never intended to be. It’s not “Heroes Day.” It is “Veterans Day.” I think we should leave it at that and stop trying to be “relevant” for today. It is what it is, and it is not what it is not.<br />
<br />
Not all sacrifices in war require the ultimate sacrifice of life. I am a Vietnam vet. While I did not sacrifice my life by dying, I did, nonetheless, sacrifice my life. I had to put my normal life on hold while I went off to war in a foreign country. My wife was left behind to await my return, and to wonder if I would return. Her life was put on hold, too. My hopes and dreams had to wait until I returned to my normal life. When I first entered service in the Army my income dropped from $550 per month to $96 per month. Was that a sacrifice? You bet! But, there were many other sacrifices — separation from my family, isolation in a strange place, danger of being killed, sleeping on the wet ground, eating things that I don’t even want to mention, watching people die right beside me, and so many other big and little things. These are the sacrifices of a soldier, and they were not unique to me. All veterans have their own stories. So, when you see a veteran this Veterans Day, realize this person has been through hell for you and thank them. I was a civilian again for 30 years before the first person said thank you to me for my service — and it made me cry! <br />
<br />
Since we have “Memorial Day” on which we remember those who have died in combat serving this country, perhaps we on Veterans Day we should remember those veterans who served and survived, who walk among us. On this Veterans Day, find a veteran and shake his or her hand and thank them for their service. When you look in the eye of combat veteran you are likely to see a lot of conflicting emotions when you do that — gratitude that someone thinks what they did was worth the effort to thank them, a flicking memory of their experience in war, the horror of watching a comrade fall dead at their side, and, at the same time, a peace and joy that only comes on the other side of war.Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-70114326331900757202011-11-11T12:24:00.000-06:002011-11-11T12:24:39.141-06:00Obama GaffsRick Perry couldn't remember during a debate the third govenment department he would eliminate if elected President, and he is viewed as stupid. Obama has been lauded by his supporters as the most brilliant person to ever be elected President. Consider the following examples and see if you agree.<br />
<br />
<object style="height: 195px; width: 320x"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/d2MzWHVEvUE?version=3&feature=player_embedded"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/d2MzWHVEvUE?version=3&feature=player_embedded" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="320" height="195"></object><br />
<br />
<br />
<object style="height: 195px; width: 320px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p9hZpJp7U3Y?version=3&feature=player_embedded"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/p9hZpJp7U3Y?version=3&feature=player_embedded" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="320" height="195"></object><br />
<br />
<br />
<object style="height: 195px; width: 320px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/t4-AKcH3eC8?version=3&feature=player_embedded"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/t4-AKcH3eC8?version=3&feature=player_embedded" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="320" height="195"></object>Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-65150408973246860092011-07-07T07:13:00.000-05:002011-07-07T07:13:25.683-05:00Have You Seen This?The short two minute ad from the Charles Koch Foundation needs to be seen by everyone. It is an excellent, factual piece on economic freedom.<br />
<br />
<object style="height: 260px; width: 430px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/v1U1Jzdghjk?version=3"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/v1U1Jzdghjk?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="430" height="260"></object>Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-86128707017397127462011-07-04T15:12:00.000-05:002011-07-04T15:12:12.858-05:00At What Price Freedom?<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Qrj3nnYi-BE/ThIeH3n0fdI/AAAAAAAAACs/aeUV9KcitUw/s1600/Signing%2BDeclaration%2Bof%2BIndependence.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear:left; float:left;margin-right:1em; margin-bottom:1em"><img border="0" height="275" width="375" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Qrj3nnYi-BE/ThIeH3n0fdI/AAAAAAAAACs/aeUV9KcitUw/s400/Signing%2BDeclaration%2Bof%2BIndependence.jpg" /></a></div><br />
Today, we celebrate the 235th birthday of the United States of America. Today some will have cookouts, eat barbeque, spend time with family and friends, and, in some parts of the country, watch fireworks. Where I live in Texas, we have had less than one-half of our normal rainfall for the year and have had 24 days with temperatures over 100 degrees. So, we won’t be having any fireworks here this year. We’ll have to watch them on television. It just seems so much not like the old July4th celebrations we had once upon a time. Maybe we’ve forgotten the meaning of it all. Maybe we have become cynical about our traditions. And maybe we’ve become disillusioned about our country. There is a spirit of pessimism running throughout America today that I don’t remember experiencing before. Maybe it’s time for a new American Revolution! Maybe it’s time the people from main street to take back their communities. Maybe, just maybe, we can recapture that Spirit of ‘76 that drove our founding fathers to dare to dream of a new nation born of liberty, freedom, and justice. Let’s look at what happened in 1776.<br />
<br />
In 1776, a group of 56 men, chosen from their respective states created a nation unlike any that had existed before it and unlike any to be created since. On July 4, 1776, gathered in modest Independence Hall in Philadelphia were the delegates to the Second Continental Congress. There, on that hot summer day, the Declaration of Independence was adopted, and the Colonies that were to become the United States of America became a free, independent and autonomous nation — free from the tyrannical rule of the British crown. <br />
<br />
But independence from Britain was not what compelled them to gather in the first place. Independence was not a prevailing sentiment amongst the people who populated the Colonies until early 1776. The Second Continental Congress was a continuation of the First Continental Congress that met briefly starting September 5, 1774, and arose out of the realization within the Colonies that even common justice would be denied them by the “Home Government.” The British government had an avaricious need to replenish their exhausted treasury, and the King and Parliament saw the Colonies as a ready solution to their problem. The idea that taxation and equitable representation were inseparable and too vital to the existence of free people. Thus the Colonists decided it was necessary for a General Council to be created to deliberate on a solution. The First Continental Congress was convened in September, 1774, for this purpose, and out of that first congress formal requests were sent to the King George III and the Parliament to cease the Coercive Acts which had been passed by the British Parliament in response to the Boston Tea Party in December 1773, which was itself a protest of the British Parliaments onerous taxes levied on the Colonies. <br />
<br />
The Stamp Act of 1765 was passed by Parliament by which they levied a tax all documents produced in connection with the Colonies — letters, deeds, contracts, invoices, etc — and other impositions of taxes on the Colonies without their consent. These Coercive Acts were intended to punish the Colonies and to assert Parliament’s view that the Colonies were merely servants of the British empire. These acts outraged the colonists and triggered sometimes violent resistence throughout the Colonies. The entreaties of the Fist Continental Congress fell on deaf ears in Britain, where the prevailing response was that increased force upon the Colonies to squelch any thoughts the Colonists may have about their right to govern themselves.<br />
<br />
The deliberations of the First Continental Congress were firm: Loyalty to the crown, even though the Colonies were suffering increased oppression. No delegates discussed, even in private conversation, the idea of independence. They concentrated their attention on how best to maintain the integrity of the British realm while at the same time preserving for the Colonies their own inalienable rights. They sent appeals to the King, to Parliament, and to men of conscious and justice in Britain. In response, new oppressions were laid upon the Colonies, including the shedding of Colonists’ blood.<br />
<br />
Having failed to convince the British Parliament to accede to the wishes of the Colonies, the Second Continental Congress was convened in Philadelphia on May 10, 1775, which set up and organized a temporary government with an army whose commander-in-chief was George Washington. Still they did not talk of independence. They were arming themselves in defense of their rights under the British Constitution. They were still, at this time, prepared to lay down their arms and declare their loyalty to Britain just as soon as their rights were restored. Their appeals were met by armed mercenaries hired by the British Government from German princes, sent to the Colonies to butcher and kill British subjects for asserting the rights of British subjects!<br />
<br />
The Second Continental Congress, which convened on May 20, 1775, was considered by those in attendance as a reconvening of the First Continental Congress, and most of the 56 delegates from twelve of the thirteen Colonies (Georgia did not send delegates until July 20, 1775) to the First Continental Congress attended the Second Continental Congress, and the Second Congress had the same officers as the First Congress. At this point the sentiment was still to attempt to convince the British Parliament and King George III to grant the Colonies more autonomy and to seek reconciliation with Britain, even though the Revolutionary War had already officially begun with the battles of Lexington and Concord in Massachusetts on April 19, 1775. <br />
<br />
The voices of some patriots had already begun to echo across the Colonies calling for independence prior to the two continental congresses. For example, as early as 1773 Patrick Henry speaking to Colonel Samuel Overton about Great Britain said, “She will drive us to extremities; no accommodation will take place; hostilities will soon commence; and a desperate bloody torch will be lit.” Overton then asked Henry if he thought the Colonies were strong enough to oppose Great Britain’s fleet and armies. Henry replied, “I will be candid with you. I doubt whether we shall be able, alone, to cope with so powerful a nation; but, where is France! — where is Spain! — where is Holland! — the natural enemies of Britain? Where will they be all this while? Do you suppose they will stand by, idle and indifferent spectators to the contest? Will Louis XVI be asleep all this time? Believe me, no! When Loius XVI shall be satisfied by our serious opposition, and our Declaration of Independence, that all prospect for reconciliation is gone, then, and not till then, will he furnish us with arms, ammunition and clothing; and not with them only, but he will send his fleets and armies to fight our battles for us; he will form a treaty with us, offensive and defensive, against our unnatural mother. Spain and Holland will join the confederation! Our independence will be established and we will take our stand among the nations of the earth!” Henry’s prediction was very accurate, because this is exactly what happened, including France, Spain, and Holland’s support of the Colonies once the Declaration of Independence was signed.<br />
<br />
Having concluded from the repeated insults and retaliation from the British Parliament to the Colonies appeals for justice that the course of reconciliation was hopeless, the Colonies finally arrived at the conclusion that independence was the only solution left by early 1776. In June, 1776, Richard Henry Lee, of Virginia, offered a resolution in the General Congress declaring all allegiance to the British crown ended. Starting with North Carolina on April 22, 1776, the colonies began to instruct their delegates to the Second Continental Congress to stand for independence. Massachusetts followed on May 10, 1776, Virginia on May 17, 1776, Rhode Island in May, 1776, Connecticut on June 14, 1776, New Hampshire on June 15, 1776, New Jersey on June 22, 1776, Pennsylvania in June, 1776. <br />
<br />
A committee was appointed for the purpose of drafting a Declaration of Independence. The committee members were Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Robert Livingston. The draft was written by Jefferson with a few verbal amendments from Franklin and Adams and was submitted to the Congress on June 28, 1776. It was brought up for discussion before the Congress on July 1st, and, after several amendments, nine states voted on July 2nd in favor of independence. On July 4, 1776, the Declaration of Independence was officially signed by John Handcock, the President of the Second Continental Congress, and the Colonies were declared free and independent states. It was engrossed in the official records of the Congress and on August 2, 1776, the Declaration of Independence was signed by all but one of the fifty-six delegates. Matthew Thornton was the last to sign the document in November, 1776.<br />
<br />
On the morning when the historical vote was taken on the Declaration of Independence in Independence Hall, the Hall’s bellman ascended the steps to the steeple. A small boy was positioned below near the door of the Hall to notify the bellman when the vote had been taken. The old man waited and waited and waited. He said to himself, “They will never do it, the will never do it.” Just then a shout rose from below. The little boy clapped his hands and shouted, “Ring! Ring!” The old man took firm hold of the tongue of the bell and swung it back and forth, back and forth a hundred times, all the while shouting, “Liberty to the land and the inhabitants thereof!”<br />
<br />
It is time for another clarion call to freedom. Today people all across America are grumbling about how things are going for them. Some are unemployed. Some have lost homes. Some have just flat lost hope. Our government reminds me of the British government in 1776. Those who sit in seats of power seem to not care one whit what the people who elected them want done. They have spent money they did not have, money that belonged to Americans who earned their money to old fashion way by working for it. Now that they’ve spend more money than those American workers provided them, their solution is to tax those same workers some more to raise more money. And they claim that if they don’t get this new tax money, the county will default on its debts — the very same debts they have run up spending someone else’s money. Does this sound any different than the British Parliament and the King? In fact, this sound exactly like them!<br />
<br />
This year, 2011, is getting late. If we are to resolve these issues, something has to be done besides the usual “go-along-to-get-along” way of doing things. We need reforms in every area of government. One of the chief things that is different about our time and 1776 is that we hold the power in our vote. Those patriots were fighting a leviathan across the sea which held all the cards and the key to the treasure chest. We hold the key to unlock the door to a successful future for our country. The key is our ballot. In 2010 a lot of people voted to change directions. In 2012 a lot of people will do it again. It is my hope and prayer that there are enough people who are motivated to actually learn about the candidates and overcome their own inertia and work for and vote for the best candidates running in their districts. <br />
<br />
It’s time for a change!!!Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-41084502312483748872011-06-09T21:59:00.003-05:002011-06-15T10:51:03.042-05:00The Second VerseDid you know there was a second verse to the National Anthem? This Marine did, and he delivered it with gusto!<br />
<br />
<object width="400" height="200"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/I0fQd858cRc&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/I0fQd858cRc&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="400" height="200"></embed></object><br />
<br />
May we all subscribe to the Marine motto: Sempre Fi. May we all be Always Faithful! <br />
<br />
Isn't it time we stopped behaving like we don't understand what is happening and start doing something about it. America has become a nation just like the people in the story about the emperor who had no clothes. Everyone pretended that the emperor was clothed because none wanted to be the first to point out the obvious embarrasment. <br />
<br />
America has declined so quickly that it is mind boggling. We must take action now to return to our foundations before the foundations are totally destroyed. This nation was founded on Christian principles. That is not just my opinion, but an objective fact for anyone who cares to actually examine the record of our founding and our early history. <br />
<br />
I for one an ready to tackle the job, and I hope everyone who reads this wil likewise be motivated to stand up and take action. Enough is enough!<br />
<br />
Copyright 2011. Bill Fisher. All rights reserved.Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-51959433565374208532011-05-30T10:49:00.002-05:002011-05-30T10:49:46.048-05:00Memorial Day 2011<div><div><div><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Mv_AMGY29lc/TeO5I7Na5mI/AAAAAAAAACg/JpJX0ZdMY_Q/s1600/Memorial%2BDay%2B-%2BBoots%2Band%2BHelmet.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; width: 400px; height: 300px; float: left; cursor: pointer;" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5612533123617842786" border="0" alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Mv_AMGY29lc/TeO5I7Na5mI/AAAAAAAAACg/JpJX0ZdMY_Q/s400/Memorial%2BDay%2B-%2BBoots%2Band%2BHelmet.jpg" /></a><br />
The day we celebrate as Memorial Day this year will find Americans having picnics, shopping the seemingly unending Memorial Day Sale Events. A few of us will visit a cemetery where a veteran of some war is buried. This should be a day of solemn remembrance of those who paid the ultimate sacrifice.<br />
<br />
The day we call Memorial Day started out as a day to encourage local communities to place flowers of the graves of the war dead after the civil war. The origin of this day seems to have its genesis from a visit to a Confederate cemetery by the wife of a Union general. In the spring of 1868, the wife of Maj. Gen. John Alexander “Black Jack” Logan accompanied Gen. William T. Sherman on a tour of southern battlefields of the civil war. She noticed everywhere she went that the Confederate graves were decorated with flowers, and she thought that should be done for the Union Army’s fallen soldiers as well. She suggested as much to her husband, and Gen. Logan issued GAR General Order No. 11, designating May 30 as Decoration Day, for "the purpose of strewing with flowers or otherwise decorating the graves of comrades who died in the defense of their country.” Here is the order:<br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote>HEADQUARTERS GRAND ARMY OF THE REPUBLIC<br />
General Orders No.11, WASHINGTON, D.C., May 5, 1868<br />
<br />
i. The 30th day of May, 1868, is designated for the purpose of strewing with flowers or otherwise decorating the graves of comrades who died in defense of their country during the late rebellion, and whose bodies now lie in almost every city, village, and hamlet church-yard in the land. In this observance no form of ceremony is prescribed, but posts and comrades will in their own way arrange such fitting services and testimonials of respect as circumstances may permit.<br />
<br />
We are organized, comrades, as our regulations tell us, for the purpose among other things, "of preserving and strengthening those kind and fraternal feelings which have bound together the soldiers, sailors, and marines who united to suppress the late rebellion." What can aid more to assure this result than cherishing tenderly the memory of our heroic dead, who made their breasts a barricade between our country and its foes? Their soldier lives were the reveille of freedom to a race in chains, and their deaths the tattoo of rebellious tyranny in arms. We should guard their graves with sacred vigilance. All that the consecrated wealth and taste of the nation can add to their adornment and security is but a fitting tribute to the memory of her slain defenders. Let no wanton foot tread rudely on such hallowed grounds. Let pleasant paths invite the coming and going of reverent visitors and fond mourners. Let no vandalism of avarice or neglect, no ravages of time testify to the present or to the coming generations that we have forgotten as a people the cost of a free and undivided republic.<br />
<br />
If other eyes grow dull, other hands slack, and other hearts cold in the solemn trust, ours shall keep it well as long as the light and warmth of life remain to us.<br />
<br />
Let us, then, at the time appointed gather around their sacred remains and garland the passionless mounds above them with the choicest flowers of spring-time; let us raise above them the dear old flag they saved from hishonor; let us in this solemn presence renew our pledges to aid and assist those whom they have left among us a sacred charge upon a nation's gratitude, the soldier's and sailor's widow and orphan.<br />
<br />
ii. It is the purpose of the Commander-in-Chief to inaugurate this observance with the hope that it will be kept up from year to year, while a survivor of the war remains to honor the memory of his departed comrades. He earnestly desires the public press to lend its friendly aid in bringing to the notice of comrades in all parts of the country in time for simultaneous compliance therewith.<br />
<br />
iii. Department commanders will use efforts to make this order effective.<br />
<br />
By order of<br />
<br />
JOHN A. LOGAN,<br />
Commander-in-Chief<br />
<br />
N.P. CHIPMAN,<br />
Adjutant General<br />
<br />
Official:<br />
WM. T. COLLINS, A.A.G. </blockquote><br />
<br />
<br />
The original date was set as May 30th, but in 1971 the U.S. Congress changed the day of observance to the last Monday in May. This year, Memorial Day actually falls on May 30th, the traditional day set aside for its celebration by Gen. Logan. While the day was set aside to memorialize the fallen soldiers of the Civil War, after WW I it became a day to memorialize those who died in any and all wars of the United States. Thus today we remember those who have died recently in the wars of Iraq and Afghanistan as well.<br />
<br />
May today be a day when we stop and actually take the time to reflect on the sacrifices made by so many so that our way of life might be preserved. Even in the Civil War, where there was such a national tear in our fabric, those who died were honored by both sides of that conflict. Today, we should lay aside our personal agendas about which wars were just and which were not and simply say ‘Thank You” to those who died so we could debate that issue in a free society.<br />
<br />
Here is a poem quoted by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in a Memorial Day speech at Harvard in 1895 entitled "The Soldier's Faith". Holmes spoke in the 1895 speech of "part of the soldier's faith: Having known great things, to be content with silence." He cited this poem as "a little song sung by a warlike people on the Danube, which seemed to me fit for a soldier's last word...a song of the sword in its scabbard, a song of oblivion and peace. A Soldier has been buried on the battlefield."<br />
<br />
<blockquote>And when the wind in the tree-tops roared,<br />
The soldier asked from the deep dark grave:<br />
"Did the banner flutter then?"<br />
"Not so, my hero," the wind replied.<br />
"The fight is done, but the banner won,<br />
Thy comrades of old have borne it hence,<br />
Have borne it in triumph hence."<br />
Then the soldier spake from the deep dark grave:<br />
"I am content."<br />
<br />
Then he heareth the lovers laughing pass,<br />
and the soldier asks once more:<br />
"Are these not the voices of them that love,<br />
That love--and remember me?"<br />
"Not so, my hero," the lovers say,<br />
"We are those that remember not;<br />
For the spring has come and the earth has smiled,<br />
And the dead must be forgot."<br />
Then the soldier spake from the deep dark grave:<br />
"I am content."</blockquote><br />
Let us remember the reason they died. It was so we could be free. Let us ever stand vigilant to watch over and preserve that freedom that was paid for by the blood and courage of so many. May we never take it for granted.<br />
<br />
Copyright © 2011. Bill Fisher. All rights reserved.</div></div></div>Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-49526782078346843532011-04-23T13:51:00.006-05:002011-04-24T07:12:20.972-05:00He Is Risen! - Easter 2011 Meditation<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-bFTPzT-FxyQ/TbQRVfd2ZmI/AAAAAAAAACY/PZMKH5-g2Oo/s1600/Angel%2BOpening%2BTomb%2B-%2BBenjamin%2BGerritsz"><img style="MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 400px; FLOAT: left; HEIGHT: 317px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5599119297649993314" border="0" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-bFTPzT-FxyQ/TbQRVfd2ZmI/AAAAAAAAACY/PZMKH5-g2Oo/s400/Angel%2BOpening%2BTomb%2B-%2BBenjamin%2BGerritsz" /></a><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />This Easter, what is it? Some say it is the most holy day of the year. Others say it is one of the holy days on the church calendar. Still others say it is a secular holiday commemorating the arrival of Spring. Some Christians refuse to celebrate Easter because they believe it is associated with a Greek goddess of fertility rite celebrated by the Romans and adapted by the church in error. Whatever it is, it is important because it has such a wide influence throughout the world. Is that influence good? Yes, I think it is. On this day, the world is reminded that the Son of God died for the sin of the world, even if the world doesn’t quite get it.<br /><br />This year, I am struck by the power of Easter — the power of the resurrection itself. The stone was rolled away from the tomb, not so that our Lord could get out — clearly solid walls could no longer contain him — but so his disciples could see in and know that he had risen from the dead. That was a big stone that had to be rolled away, and there was no man who could do it. Then, there is the power of the resurrection of Jesus within the tomb. That was the same power that moved over the chaos of the void before creation when God spoke and the worlds were created.<br /><br />Think about this. At the creation, everything happened because God spoke a word. Did God speak at the resurrection? Did he, like Jesus at the raising of Lazarus, say, “Jesus, come forth?” But Jesus is the Word. John tells us that all that was created was created through him, the Word. So think about this: Jesus, the Word, spoke his resurrection into being before he died as he told his disciples that on the third day he would be raised from the dead. He had already spoken the Word of his resurrection before he died on the cross.<br /><br />This Easter, our nation is faced with some mighty challenges. Our government is spending more than it has. Our leaders seem incapable of figuring out a solution. The price of gasoline is rising. Thousands of people have lost their jobs and homes. The government we have been depending on is running out of answers. People are getting worried about their future. Hope does not burn brightly in their breasts this Easter morning.<br /><br />But we need not fear. Read Psalm 91:<br /><blockquote>5 You will not fear the terror of night,<br />nor the arrow that flies by day,<br />6 nor the pestilence that stalks in the darkness,<br />nor the plague that destroys at midday.<br />7 A thousand may fall at your side,<br />ten thousand at your right hand,<br />but it will not come near you.<br />8 You will only observe with your eyes<br />and see the punishment of the wicked.<br /></blockquote><br />The power of God is able to deliver us from this mess we find ourselves in. Has man ever made such a mess of things that God could not untangle it? No, and man never will, because man is simply not smart enough, powerful enough, or clever enough.<br /><br />Starting sometime early in the 20th Century, Europeans and Americans began to think they had found a better way of doing things. The old, traditional ways simply would no longer serve the needs of the modern 20th Century world. So, as humankind is wont to do, they decided they could build a better world than the one God built and the one He maintained for their enjoyment. They reasoned among themselves that, in their view, everything was subject to change. Therefore, change must be an immutable law of sorts that they needed to harness for their own purposes. Then they decided that absolute truth, the kind God dispenses, was an obstaccle to this new-found change principle, so they would need an alternative. Moral relativism was their solution. This led them to turn everything upside down, calling what had been passe and of no more benefit. They threw out centuries of understanding and reliance on the beneficence of their Creator and replaced it with the beneficence of the State, which, of course, they controlled.<br /><br />In the words of Stan Laurel “Well, here's another nice mess you've gotten me into!” The problem is we have gotten ourselves in this mess by abandoning the truth for a lie. We have reached a point where now, finally, we are beginning to see that politicians are not to be trusted. If the polls are to be believed, the American people have become very distrustful of government and those who run it. Good! But what are they putting in the place of government as the object of their trust? Certainly not God. Church attendance is down. Religion, especially Christianity, is waning as influence over the morals of the nation.<br /><br />The answer is right there in front of us. It is Easter! The resurrection power of Jesus Christ to resurrect us from our miserable attempts to become our own gods and rule our own lives. As Jeremiah writes in Jer. 10:23, “O LORD, I know the way of man is not in himself; It is not in man who walks to direct his own steps. “ We need God to direct our path, to show us the way out of the mess we are in. We have no power in ourselves that we should be gods. We are weak compared to the power of the creation, much less the power of the one who created it.<br /><br />Have you ever stood in the surf and felt the awesome power of the water as it rolls in? Have you ever seen the power of a flood as it washes away everything in its path? Or the fury of a forest fire burning out of control? Or felt the earth tremble and shake during an earthquake? Our power, even in the machines and inventions of our most capable geniuses pale into insignificance when compared to the power of nature. And, yet, mankind still keeps believing he can come up with a better plan. How arrogant!<br /><br />So, this Easter, I am focusing on the Power of Easter. “He is Risen” is a powerful statement, and it is my new power source. No matter what my eyes see in the coming year, I will remember “He is Risen.” No matter how large the challenge, how deep the hole, or how hopeless life appears, I will remember “He is Risen.” No matter what the world may throw at me, I will remember “HE IS RISEN!!!”<br /><br />May this Easter be a breakthrough time for all of us as we ponder and digest the Power of Easter and as we confess “He is Risen” in our life anew this Easter.<br /><br /><span style="font-size:78%;">Copyright 2011. By Bill Fisher. All Rights Reserved.</span>Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-33812887579258924992011-04-22T12:17:00.003-05:002011-04-22T12:31:42.414-05:00<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-U0KcP_kKvao/TbG4ZFtwXdI/AAAAAAAAACI/c_YGX-o_r2M/s1600/Good%2BFriday%2B-%2BIt%2Bis%2BFinished.jpg"><img style="MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 400px; FLOAT: left; HEIGHT: 299px; CURSOR: hand" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5598458552968568274" border="0" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-U0KcP_kKvao/TbG4ZFtwXdI/AAAAAAAAACI/c_YGX-o_r2M/s400/Good%2BFriday%2B-%2BIt%2Bis%2BFinished.jpg" /></a><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><strong><span style="font-size:180%;">Good Friday<br /></span></strong>A Meditation<br />By Bill Fisher<br />Copyright © 2011 by Bill Fisher. All rights reserved.<br /><br /><br />Today is Good Friday. Courthouses are closed in some places. Some government offices are closed. Some places of business are closed. Why? Here in the United States, a supposedly Christian nation, for those who are off work today, Good Friday has become just another day when they don’t have to go to work. Have we lost our bearings? Do we no longer revere the holy symbols of our faith?<br /><br />Good Friday is the Friday before Easter Sunday. It is the day the Christian church remembers the passion of our Lord Jesus Christ on the cross. Did you see the movie? Do you remember what Jesus endured on that day some 2,000 years ago? Does it matter?<br /><br />If Good Friday is to be a day of remembrance, then certainly it should mean something, or else why have it on the calendar. This day comes at the end of what is called Holy Week, the week leading up to Easter Sunday. During Holy Week pastors of churches all over the world are busy conducting services leading up to the ultimate service on Easter Sunday. By the time they finish the Sunday services, they are typically exhausted. But what about their flocks? Are they exhausted from the weeks devotions? Or, are they simply exhausted from working all week and happy to have the day off on Friday, if they are among the lucky few who actually get to take the day off?<br /><br />In 1957, according to the Gallup polling firm, 69% of Americans believed that religion was increasing in influence in the United States. That has changed! In Gallup’s December 9, 2010, poll report, 70% of Americans believe that religion is a declining influence in the US. Why the flip-flop? What has happened to cause the change?<br /><br />Well, a lot has happened since 1957. We have gone through a cultural metamorphosis. We have moved away from the foundational truths that sustained us from the founding of the nation to a more “enlightened” way. Now, we are in a era where moral relativism rules the day. There is no longer any absolute right or wrong. All things are relative. We have morphed into a secular humanistic society in which God is no longer relevant or even welcomed to attend our institutions. We must keep God in our church buildings as much as possible, and, where possible, keep Him out of there, too.<br /><br />Scripture tells us in Psalm 94:<br /><blockquote><br /><p>4 They pour out arrogant words;<br />all the evildoers are full of boasting.<br />5 They crush your people, LORD;<br />they oppress your inheritance.<br />6 They slay the widow and the foreigner;<br />they murder the fatherless.<br />7 They say, “The LORD does not see;<br />the God of Jacob takes no notice.” </p></blockquote><br /><p>Our society today seems to believe that God is not paying attention, and if He is, He doesn’t care what we are doing. Therefore, God is not having the influence on our society that He once did. After all, God is the one who set out all those obsolete absolute rules and values for men to follow, and, of course, we 21st century geniuses have moved beyond all that. We know what is best for us. And beside that, things change, so we have to be changeable to keep up with the times. There is no place for an unchangeable God. We don’t need that any more. So they say!<br /><br />So, on this Good Friday, while the world is going about its business as though nothing really happened that matters to them, Christians are following the traditions of their faith and honoring God by remembering the death of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. He is the cornerstone the builders of our modern society have rejected while they build their monuments to themselves on the ever shifting sands of moral relativism.<br /><br />The remnant of the faithful continue to provide the foundations for the world, even when the world pays no attention. The faithful, by the very act of their faithfulness, serve as a redeeming force to show the way for the rest of the world. Today, as the Christian church remembers Good Friday, the act of remembrance serves all mankind, be they atheists, Muslims, Buddhist, or any of the many other religions practiced by people trying to create their own gods. It is the Christian community that holds up the Light that lights the world, and the darkness cannot snuff it out. All Jesus did that day was take away the sin of the world. It is finished!!!<br /><br />As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord. </p>Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-57010817968753739112010-05-31T12:22:00.003-05:002010-05-31T12:29:18.495-05:00Memorial Day Remembrance 2010<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_-o-zmfb7bJA/TAPxZiAifQI/AAAAAAAAABo/PUz_dN0ApAU/s1600/Tomb+of+Unknown+Soldier.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 268px; height: 400px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_-o-zmfb7bJA/TAPxZiAifQI/AAAAAAAAABo/PUz_dN0ApAU/s400/Tomb+of+Unknown+Soldier.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5477486992740744450" /></a><br />Today is Memorial Day, a day set aside to honor those brave souls who have fought and died for the freedom of a nation built upon their sacrifice. It is often the young who go off to war and who die. But it is their courage and determination that drives them to make the ultimate sacrifice. <br /><br />My father-in-law, Raymond Smith, went off to war during World War II as a 19 year old young man with the determination in his heart that he was personally going to kill Hitler. He didn’t get the chance to kill Hitler because he was a part of a special operation known as Merrill’s Marauders that served in Burma during the war. Raymond was wounded and nearly died. He received a Purple Heart, a Bronze Star, and a Silver Star for his gallantry during that campaign. I’m glad he survived so I could one day meet and marry his daughter.<br /><br />My own father, Lee Fisher, served in George Patton’s Third Army during World War II, and was in five major battles. Thankfully, he survived, too. I had him in my life until he was 85.<br /><br />I am a Vietnam Vet having served in the U.S. Army from 1966 to 1969. I endured the fateful year of 1968. For those of you who don’t know, look up that year and take note of all of the major events that happened in that one year. One of the strange things about my own experience is that I don’t remember very many names, but there are faces I can never forget — fallen comrades as well as fellow survivors. But one thing I do remember. We all knew that what we were doing was important to the survival of our way of life. Unfortunately, many in our county didn’t understand that, and so, those of us who served in that war were never treated with respect. It was 30 years after I returned to civilian life before anyone ever said “Thank You” to me for my service. Thank God those who serve today are better respected by most people. <br /><br />May we always remember with profound respect the sacrifices made by so many so that we can have the freedoms we enjoy as Americans, and may we never take those freedoms for granted. I would like to share with you President Ronald Reagan's 1986 Memorial Day remarks at Arlington National Cemetery:<br /><br /><blockquote>Today is the day we put aside to remember fallen heroes and to pray that no heroes will ever have to die for us again. It's a day of thanks for the valor of others, a day to remember the splendor of America and those of her children who rest in this cemetery and others. It's a day to be with the family and remember.<br /><br />I was thinking this morning that across the country children and their parents will be going to the town parade and the young ones will sit on the sidewalks and wave their flags as the band goes by. Later, maybe, they'll have a cookout or a day at the beach. And that's good, because today is a day to be with the family and to remember.<br /><br />Arlington, this place of so many memories, is a fitting place for some remembering. So many wonderful men and women rest here, men and women who led colorful, vivid, and passionate lives. There are the greats of the military: Bull Halsey and the Admirals Leahy, father and son; Black Jack Pershing; and the GI's general, Omar Bradley. Great men all, military men. But there are others here known for other things.<br /><br />Here in Arlington rests a sharecropper's son who became a hero to a lonely people. Joe Louis came from nowhere, but he knew how to fight. And he galvanized a nation in the days after Pearl Harbor when he put on the uniform of his country and said, "I know we'll win because we're on God's side." Audie Murphy is here, Audie Murphy of the wild, wild courage. For what else would you call it when a man bounds to the top of a disabled tank, stops an enemy advance, saves lives, and rallies his men, and all of it single-handedly. When he radioed for artillery support and was asked how close the enemy was to his position, he said, "Wait a minute and I'll let you speak to them." [Laughter]<br /><br />Michael Smith is here, and Dick Scobee, both of the space shuttle Challenger. Their courage wasn't wild, but thoughtful, the mature and measured courage of career professionals who took prudent risks for great reward——in their case, to advance the sum total of knowledge in the world. They're only the latest to rest here; they join other great explorers with names like Grissom and Chaffee.<br /><br />Oliver Wendell Holmes is here, the great jurist and fighter for the right. A poet searching for an image of true majesty could not rest until he seized on "Holmes dissenting in a sordid age." Young Holmes served in the Civil War. He might have been thinking of the crosses and stars of Arlington when he wrote: "At the grave of a hero we end, not with sorrow at the inevitable loss, but with the contagion of his courage; and with a kind of desperate joy we go back to the fight."<br /><br />All of these men were different, but they shared this in common: They loved America very much. There was nothing they wouldn't do for her. And they loved with the sureness of the young. It's hard not to think of the young in a place like this, for it's the young who do the fighting and dying when a peace fails and a war begins. Not far from here is the statue of the three servicemen——the three fighting boys of Vietnam. It, too, has majesty and more. Perhaps you've seen it——three rough boys walking together, looking ahead with a steady gaze. There's something wounded about them, a kind of resigned toughness. But there's an unexpected tenderness, too. At first you don't really notice, but then you see it. The three are touching each other, as if they're supporting each other, helping each other on.<br /><br />I know that many veterans of Vietnam will gather today, some of them perhaps by the wall. And they're still helping each other on. They were quite a group, the boys of Vietnam——boys who fought a terrible and vicious war without enough support from home, boys who were dodging bullets while we debated the efficacy of the battle. It was often our poor who fought in that war; it was the unpampered boys of the working class who picked up the rifles and went on the march. They learned not to rely on us; they learned to rely on each other. And they were special in another way: They chose to be faithful. They chose to reject the fashionable skepticism of their time. They chose to believe and answer the call of duty. They had the wild, wild courage of youth. They seized certainty from the heart of an ambivalent age; they stood for something.<br /><br />And we owe them something, those boys. We owe them first a promise: That just as they did not forget their missing comrades, neither, ever, will we. And there are other promises. We must always remember that peace is a fragile thing that needs constant vigilance. We owe them a promise to look at the world with a steady gaze and, perhaps, a resigned toughness, knowing that we have adversaries in the world and challenges and the only way to meet them and maintain the peace is by staying strong.<br /><br />That, of course, is the lesson of this century, a lesson learned in the Sudetenland, in Poland, in Hungary, in Czechoslovakia, in Cambodia. If we really care about peace, we must stay strong. If we really care about peace, we must, through our strength, demonstrate our unwillingness to accept an ending of the peace. We must be strong enough to create peace where it does not exist and strong enough to protect it where it does. That's the lesson of this century and, I think, of this day. And that's all I wanted to say. The rest of my contribution is to leave this great place to its peace, a peace it has earned.<br /><br />Thank all of you, and God bless you, and have a day full of memories.</blockquote>Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-57382941088629623912010-05-16T13:05:00.003-05:002010-05-16T13:12:58.748-05:00Arizona's New Immigration LawThere is a lot of handwringing by liberals about how unconstitutional the new Arizona immigration law is. Of course, I doubt if one in a 1,000 of those who are complaining have actually read the law. I have. But rather than give you my opinion, let me share with you what the person who actually wrote the law has to say on the subject.<br /><br /><blockquote>I am the author of Senate Bill 1070, signed by Gov. Jan Brewer.<br /><br />Maybe liberals ought to read the Constitution, case law or even just the bill itself before citing incorrect information. Fear-mongering and misinformation are the opponents' only tool against this common sense legislation.<br /><br />"Illegal" is not a race, it is a crime. SB1070 simply codifies federal law into state law, removes excuses and concerns about states' inherent authority to enforce these laws and removes all illegal "sanctuary" policies.<br /><br />When do we stand up for Americans and the rule of law? If not now, when? We are a nation of laws, a Constitutional Republic.<br /><br />Arizona did not make illegal, illegal. Illegal was already illegal. It is a crime to enter or remain in the U.S. in violation of federal law. States have had inherent authority to enforce immigration laws and have failed or refused to do so. Sanctuary policies are illegal under federal law (8 USC 1644 & 1373) yet we have them all over the United States.<br /><br />Paul Kantner of the 1960s rock band Jefferson Airplane once remarked, "San Francisco is 49 square miles surrounded by reality." When I first heard that San Francisco was planning to boycott Arizona over the SB1070 legislation that I introduced, this description seemed fitting.<br /><br />However, when neighboring Oakland's city council voted 7-0 to boycott Arizona last Tuesday, and President Pro Tem of the California State Senate Derrell Steinberg announced a campaign in the legislature to boycott us, it became clear that San Francisco is merely ahead of the California crazy curve.<br /><br />Why did I propose SB1070? I saw the enormous fiscal and social costs that illegal immigration was imposing on my state. I saw Americans out of work, hospitals and schools overflowing, and budgets strained. Most disturbingly, I saw my fellow citizens victimized by illegal alien criminals. The murder of Robert Krentz - whose family had been ranching in Arizona since 1907 - by illegal alien drug dealers was the final straw for many Arizonans.<br /><br />Illegal aliens have murdered dozens of other citizens of our state. Currently, 95 illegal aliens are in Maricopa County jail on murder charges.<br /><br />Most of the hysterical critics of the bill do not even know what is in it. All SB1070 does is allow Arizona law enforcement officials to detain illegal aliens under state law. The law does not allow police to stop suspected illegal aliens unless they have already come across them through normal "lawful conduct" such as a traffic stop, and explicitly prohibits racial profiling.<br /><br />Aside from the unfounded accusation of racial profiling, the chief complaint about the bill is that it infringes on federal jurisdiction by enforcing laws. However, a long legal precedent going back to 1976 allows states to enact legislation to discourage illegal immigration so long as it does not conflict with federal law. We specifically designed SB1070 to mirror federal immigration law to avoid such a conflict.<br /><br />For all their newfound respect for the authority of federal immigration law, the open borders advocates who oppose SB1070 have no problems with "sanctuary cities" such as San Francisco that explicitly obstruct federal immigration authorities to protect illegal aliens. In 2008, San Francisco began a campaign to encourage illegal aliens to take advantage of the city's public services.<br /><br />Mayor Gavin Newsom stated, "We have worked with the Board of Supervisors, Department of Public Health, labor and immigrant rights groups to create a city government-wide public awareness campaign so that immigrants know the city won't target them for using city services."<br /><br />The results were tragic. A few months after the campaign, Edwin Ramos, an illegal alien and member of the MS 13 gang, murdered San Francisco resident Tony Bologna and his two sons whom he mistook for rival gang members. Ramos had a lengthy criminal record including a felony assault on a pregnant woman. Police arrested him on gang and weapons charges and promptly released him just three months before the murder. Not once did San Francisco report him to immigration authorities.<br /><br />Our law is already working. One can just scan the newspapers and see dozens of headlines like "Illegal Immigrants Leaving Arizona Over New Law: Tough, Controversial New Legislation Scares Many in Underground Workforce Out of State,"<br /><br />In contrast, American citizens are leaving California. For the past four years, more Americans have left the state than have moved in.<br /><br />In criticizing the SB1070, President Barack Obama said, "Our failure to act responsibly at the federal level will only open the door to irresponsibility by others." There is nothing irresponsible about enforcing our law, but President Obama is right in that this is only necessary because the federal government does not do its job.<br /><br />The solution is not "comprehensive immigration reform," a euphemism for amnesty. This will only encourage more illegal immigration. Making illegal aliens legal does nothing to change the social and fiscal costs they impose on Arizona or the nation as a whole. In fact, the Heritage Foundation's research puts the cost of amnesty at more than $2.5 trillion.<br /><br />The federal government simply needs to enforce its immigration laws by cracking down on employers of illegal aliens, securing our borders, and deporting illegal alien criminals. Attrition by enforcement.<br /><br />If states understand states' rights and our Constitutional duty and responsibility to our citizens this legislation in Arizona will be a model for states across the nation and the federal government and it will end illegal immigration to America, but President Obama is looking toward San Francisco instead.<br /><br /><br /><em>Russell Pearce is a member of the Arizona State Senate representing Legislative District 18 and author of SB1070.</em><br /></blockquote><br /><br />Maybe it's better than they say it is. Here is my "e-trade baby shock face."Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-81190654295513519262010-02-19T10:38:00.002-06:002010-02-19T11:08:18.150-06:00Mount Vernon StatementIt seems to a lot of people these days that the leaders of the United States have lost their bearings. They have wandered off the path that was laid out for this nation in 1776. Thus, the Tea Party. People are upset, yes, even angry, that their government leaders are not listening to them. They are upset that their leaders are attempting to cram down their throats policies and laws they have soundly rejected. There is an unrest in the land, and some have likened it to a revolution of sorts. Perhaps it is a revolution.<br /><br />The revolution may have started on February 17, 2010, when the largest number of conservatives ever assembled met at Mount Vernon and their leaders signed, what has been named, the "Mount Vernon Statement." It is a straight forward statement of the principles upon which the United States was founded in 1776. It calls for a return to the fundamental, foundational truths of those ideals and values that prompted Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and the rest to create what has become the United States of America. For those of you who have not read the Mount Vernon Statement, it reprinted here.<br /><br />May God help us to rise to the occasion and preserve our heritage as Americans.<br /><br /><br /><div align="center"><br /></div><blockquote><div align="center"><strong>The Mount Vernon Statement<br /></strong>Constitutional<br />Conservatism: A Statement for the 21st Century<br />February 17, 2010</div><div align="left"><br />We recommit ourselves to the ideas of the American Founding. Through the Constitution, the Founders created an enduring framework of limited government based on the rule of law. They sought to secure national independence, provide for economic opportunity, establish true religious liberty and maintain a flourishing society of republican self-government.<br /><br />These principles define us as a country and inspire us as a people. They are responsible for a prosperous, just nation unlike any other in the world. They are our highest achievements, serving not only as powerful beacons to all who strive for freedom and seek self-government, but as warnings to tyrants and despots everywhere.<br /><br />Each one of these founding ideas is presently under sustained attack. In recent decades, America’s principles have been undermined and redefined in our culture, our universities and our politics. The self-evident truths of 1776 have been supplanted by the notion that no such truths exist. The federal government today ignores the limits of the Constitution, which is increasingly dismissed as obsolete and irrelevant.<br /><br />Some insist that America must change, cast off the old and put on the new. But where would this lead — forward or backward, up or down? Isn’t this idea of change an empty promise or even a dangerous deception?<br /><br />The change we urgently need, a change consistent with the American ideal, is not movement away from but toward our founding principles. At this important time, we need a restatement of Constitutional conservatism grounded in the priceless principle of ordered liberty articulated in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.<br /><br />The conservatism of the Declaration asserts self-evident truths based on the laws of nature and nature’s God. It defends life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It traces authority to the consent of the governed. It recognizes man’s self-interest but also his capacity for virtue.<br /><br />The conservatism of the Constitution limits government’s powers but ensures that government performs its proper job effectively. It refines popular will through the filter of representation. It provides checks and balances through the several branches of government and a federal republic. A Constitutional conservatism unites all conservatives through the natural fusion provided by American principles. It reminds economic conservatives that morality is essential to limited government, social conservatives that unlimited government is a threat to moral self-government, and national security conservatives that energetic but responsible government is the key to America’s safety and leadership role in the world. A Constitutional conservatism based on first principles provides the framework for a consistent and meaningful policy agenda.<br /><br /></div><ul><li>It applies the principle of limited government based on the rule of law to every proposal.<br /><br /></li><li>It honors the central place of individual liberty in American politics and life.<br /><br /></li><li>It encourages free enterprise, the individual entrepreneur, and economic reforms grounded in market solutions.<br /><br /></li><li>It supports America’s national interest in advancing freedom and opposing tyranny in the world and prudently considers what we can and should do to that end.<br /><br /></li><li>It informs conservatism’s firm defense of family, neighborhood, community, and faith. </li></ul><p>If we are to succeed in the critical political and policy battles ahead, we must be certain of our purpose.<br /><br />We must begin by retaking and resolutely<br />defending the high ground of America’s founding principles.</p></blockquote><br /><br />If you agree with this statement, visit the <a href="http://www.heritage.org/MountVernon/">Heritage Foundation</a> and sign the statement.<br /><br /><br /><br /></li>Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-73804553417024439362009-12-12T09:43:00.000-06:002009-12-12T09:43:40.610-06:00Anglican Curmudgeon: What's the Difference Between Republicans and Democrats?<a href="http://accurmudgeon.blogspot.com/2009/12/whats-difference-between-republicans.html">Anglican Curmudgeon: What's the Difference Between Republicans and Democrats?</a>Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-26161036946047754532009-10-06T09:30:00.002-05:002009-10-27T12:10:47.773-05:00The Problem Hidden Inside Healthcare ReformBy Bill Fisher<br /><span style="font-size:85%;">Oct</span><span style="font-size:78%;">ober 6, 2009<br />Copyright © 2009 by William L. Fisher. All rights reserved.</span><br /><br />The debate over healthcare reform continues to shift from one point to the other, and the Obama Administration continues to identify new enemies of healthcare reform on a daily basis. Lately, Obama and his followers have identified the insurance industry as the bad guy dejour. In fact, if you are listening closely, you will notice that the proponents of Obamcare have changed the name of their plan from “healthcare reform” to “health insurance reform.” The subtlety of this change has flown over the heads of most of America. But we should be paying attention, because this change lays bare the plan to nationalize health care on a level never seen in the US.<br /><br />All of the talk about insurance plans being required to provide first day coverage without any limits for pre-existing conditions strikes a positive chord in the minds of most people. That sounds like a good idea. Other suggestions have come out about what should be required to be covered by these insurance policies. Some have merit, some are really bad ideas.<br /><br />One such idea is the health insurance exchange. The idea is that people who are having a problem buying affordable health care insurance will be able to go to the health care exchange program and buy affordable health care insurance there by choosing the plan that fits their need and their pocketbook. The only problem with this idea is that it all depends on attracting health insurance companies who will place their policies in the exchange. What incentive is offered to attract these products? None! So, even if such a system is created by Obamacare, how will it function if the basic premise for its existence fails to materialize? The answer is it will not function, and those benefits that were going to be offered through the exchange will now have to be included in the government option part of Obamacare. Once the exchange becomes part of the public option, the overwhelming tendency then will be to just simply blend the exchange and the public option into one product, which will be government run.<br /><br />But what is not being discussed in this debate is the monumental change in the regulation of insurance in America that will be required to accomplish any of these changes. At the present time, insurance companies are regulated by the states. Every state has a Department of Insurance, State Board of Insurance, State Insurance Commission, or some other official agency of state government that oversees the regulation of insurance companies within each state. State legislatures create the rules by which insurance companies are permitted to do business in their state. Insurance companies are required to be registered business entities in each state. Everything about an insurance company’s business is regulated by the state in which it does business.<br /><br />In order for Obamacare to accomplish its goal of nationalizing health care, it is absolutely essential that the authority for regulating insurance companies be transferred from the states to the national government. The size of such an undertaking is mind boggling. And it cannot be done swiftly. It will take time to dismantle the state infrastructures of government that have regulated insurance every since there was insurance. The federal government has never regulated insurance, and the federal government doesn't know how to regulate insurance. It will have to learn. How long will that take, and how many mistakes will our federal government make along the way while it is learning?<br /><br />Someone may object and point to Social Security or Medicare. Neither of these are insurance. Social Security is a government run retirement system that relies on current taxpayers paying benefits to current retirees. No actuarial science is used. The same for Medicare. Premiums do not pay for the Medicare benefits, taxes pay for those benefits. So, just like Social Security, Medicare beneficiaries have their benefits paid for by current taxpayers. No actuarial science is involved.<br /><br />If we are to have the kind of healthcare reform being discussed today, the federal government will have to become the largest insurance company in history. They’ve done a lousy job of handling Medicare and Social Security, so why would Americans want to hand over the job of running the insurance industry.Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-21001880502601622952009-10-04T10:04:00.002-05:002009-10-04T10:08:53.398-05:00Fort Worth Case Summary Part 1On Friday, October 2, 2009, the 141st District Court, Fort Worth, issued its ruling on three pre-trial motions. The results are not alll surprising, and should not be taken as any landmarks concerning the ultimate outcome of the case. These are merely the initial follies from the first skirmishes. The results, however, were, by and large, quite favorable for Bp. Iker's side.<br /><br />The court had three issues before it. One issue was Bp. Iker's side's request for a continuance on the faux diocese's motion for partial summary judgment. The court granted the continuance, which is normal, especially when such a motion is filed so early in the proecedings as to make discovery impossible before the hearing. <br /><br />The second issue was Bp. Iker's side's request to broaden the playing field to include the individuals who allegedly hired Nelson and Wells to represent the faux diocese and who, themselves, claim to be the representatives of the faux dioocese. The court allowed these individuals to be brought into the suit to defend themselves. After all, these people sued Bp. Iker and the individuals who make up the Board of Trustees of the Corporation of the Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth, so it is only fair that the individuals on the other side share in the fun. This is not a particularly surprising development, but it is one indication that Bp. Ikers' side has a very good lawyer.<br /><br />Finally, Bp. Iker's side asked the court to revise its previous Rule 12 order which included the qualifier that Nelson and Wells did not represent the diocese or the corporation associated with Bp. Iker, which, of course, as they have responded, they never claimed to represent in the first place. The court refused to change it's order. However, this issue raises the most interesting questions of the three. If Nelson and Wells don't claim to represent the diocses and corporation associated with Bp. Iker, the ones established in 1983, and since there is at present only one such diocese and corporation, then, which diocese and corporation, pray tell, do they represent. Here lies the crux of the problem for their side, and, based on the transcripts of the hearings on the Rule 12 motion, the judge gets that they don't represent the one and only diocese. However, the judge, who is new to the bench, also understands that his ruling will be appealed and is being very careful. He will not be overruled for making the rulings he has made thus far, but he could have faced being overruled if he had ruled otherwise.<br /><br />So far, Bp. Iker's side is looking pretty good.Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-58804615831210334982009-10-02T09:15:00.002-05:002009-10-02T09:54:15.424-05:00Community Oganizers Pray To ObamaThe video shown below is a shocking example of how far adrift the United States has gone from its foundations. It should be unthinkable that any group of people in this country would even conceive of praying to a person, even one who has been elected President of the United States. But here it is. Our churches have so abandoned the Gospel of Jesus Christ for the Gospel of the Age that many who currently lead the church have no compass with which to lead. Pray for America!<br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CnXbuoOiuk8&hl=en&fs=1&"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CnXbuoOiuk8&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-49331191279175914932009-07-21T09:08:00.006-05:002009-09-12T08:53:52.349-05:00We The People Stimulus PackageIt is time for us to demand that our elected officials listen to us again. We need common sense applied by patriots to the challenges of our times. I hope the videos that follow will stir within you the desire and courage to act.<br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jeYscnFpEyA&hl=en&fs=1&"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jeYscnFpEyA&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pKFKGrmsBDk&hl=en&fs=1&"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pKFKGrmsBDk&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>"<br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xxDwBYjL3Fc&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xxDwBYjL3Fc&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-14934654405031691622009-06-19T22:59:00.004-05:002009-06-19T23:29:57.258-05:00With all of the action of late and all of the discussion about health care reform, I thought some of you might be nterested in hearing the following speech by Ronald Reagan during the 1961 Operation Coffee Cup Campaign against Socialized Medicine as proposed by the Democrats, then a private citizen Ronald Reagan Speaks out against socialized medicine. There is no video ...<br /><br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fRdLpem-AAs&hl=en&fs=1&"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fRdLpem-AAs&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /><br /><br />This was said almost 50 years ago in 1961, but it is very much like what is going on now. Reagan was talking about what ultimately became medicare, and he was right about it being a foot in the door. In the middle to late 1960's, before and after my stint in the U.S. Army, I was a CPA in Houston, Texas. One of my jobs was conducting a medicare cost audit for a hospital in Houston. In order to do the audit, I had to become somewhat of an expert on medicare cost reimbursement rules and regulations. During the course of my audit, I came to the inescabable conclusion that medicare would cause the cost of health care to rise dramatically over the next 20 years. Under the initial medicare program, medicare paid the average price charged in a geographic area for medical procedures and treatment. It did not take a rocket scientist to figure out that if medicare paid the average price for everything it covered, the price of everything it paid for would have to go up. By paying the average price, medicare insured that the average would rise over time, and as the average rose, so would the upper brackets of charges rise. Thus the cost of medical care had to rise. This upward pressure applied through medicare fueled the flame of escalating costs for all medical careBill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070357.post-55476116687849965312009-05-04T21:36:00.011-05:002009-05-04T22:38:43.293-05:00San Joaquin Tentative RulingBelow you will find the full text of the "Tentative Ruling" issued today in the case in Fresno, California, in which TEC sued Bp. Schofield and the true Diocese of San Joaquin. The result of this ruling is that TEC gets it all. However, this is not the end of the matter. It is a "tentative" ruling and is subject to revision after a hearing, which is scheduled for May 5, 2009. Do not despair. This is just the first round in this case, and it does not mean that any other cases in Fort Worth, Pittsburg, or Quincy will follow. This is only the first ruling by the trial court, and if it remains as is, it will be appealed to a higher court.<br /><br /><div align="center"><strong>Tentative Ruling</strong> </div><div align="left"><br />Re: Diocese of San Joaquin v. Schofield, et al.,<br /><br />Superior Court Case No. 08 CECG 01425<br /><br />Hearing Date: May 5, 2009 (Dept. 97A)<br /><br />Motion: Summary Adjudication<br /><br /><strong>Tentative Ruling: To grant.</strong><br /><br /><strong>Explanation:</strong><br /><br />In ruling on a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, the court must "consider all of the evidence' and all of the 'inferences' reasonably drawn therefrom and must view such evidence and such inferences 'in the light most favorable to the opposing party." (<em>Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.</em> (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843.) In making this determination, courts usually follow a three prong analysis: identifying the issues as framed by the pleadings; determining whether the moving party has established facts negating the opposing party's claims and justifying judgment in the movant's favor; and determining whether the opposition demonstrates the existence of a triable issue of material fact. (<em>Lease & Rental Management Corp. v. Arrowhead Central Credit Union </em>(2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 1052, 1057-1058.)<br /><br />The court's sole function on a motion for summary judgment is issue finding, not issue-determination. The court must determine from the evidence submitted whether there is a 'triable issue as to any material fact.' (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(c); <em>Zavala v. Arce</em> (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 915, 926.) "A plaintiff moving for summary adjudication of a cause of action must establish each element of the cause of action. … . If the moving party satisfies its initial burden, the burden shifts to the opposing party to set forth "specific facts showing that a triable issue of material fact exists. The court must view the evidence and reasonable inferences from the evidence in the light most favorable to the opposing party, as on a motion for summary judgment." (<em>Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Helliker</em> (2006) 138 Cal. App. 4th 1135, 1154-55.)<br /><br /><em>First Cause of Action for Declaratory Relief</em><br /><br />The first cause of action for declaratory relief alleges, in relevant part:<br /><blockquote>101. Defendants take the position that defendant Schofield was authorized to revise the articles of "The Protestant Episcopal Bishop of San Joaquin, a corporation sole" in 2006 and 2008, and that defendant Schofield may continue as the incumbent of "The Protestant Episcopal Bishop of San Joaquin, a corporation sole" and as President of the Episcopal Foundation and the Investment Trust after leaving the Episcopal Church and being deposed.</blockquote><br /><blockquote>102. Plaintiffs contend to the contrary, that the purported amendments to the articles of the corporation sole were ultra vires, invalid and void, and that defendant Schofield may not continue as the incumbent of "The Protestant Episcopal Bishop of San Joaquin, a corporation sole," or as President of the Episcopal Foundation or the Investment Trust, after leaving the Episcopal Church and being deposed.</blockquote>Secular courts, when resolving church property disputes, must not entangle themselves in disputes over church doctrine or infringe the free exercise of religion. (<em>In re Episcopal Church Cases</em> (2009) 45 Cal.4th 467, 478-479.) In <em>In re Episcopal Church Cases</em> (2009) 45 Cal.4th 467, the California Supreme Court held that we must apply the "neutral principles of law" approach to resolving church property disputes in a hierarchical church organization.<br /><br />In doing so, "State courts must not decide questions of religious doctrine; the court must defer to the position of the highest ecclesiastical authority that has decided the point. But to the extent the court can resolve a property dispute without reference to church doctrine, it should apply neutral principles of law. The court should consider sources such as the deeds to the property in dispute, the local church’s articles of incorporation, the general church’s constitution, canon, and rules, and relevant statutes, including statutes specifically concerning religious property, such as Corporations Code section 9142." (<em>In re Episcopal Church Cases, supra</em>, 45 Cal.4th at p. 485.)<br /><br />A hierarchical church is one in which individual churches are organized as a body with other churches having similar faith and doctrine, and with a common ruling convocation or ecclesiastical head vested with ultimate ecclesiastical authority over the individual congregations and members of the entire organized church. (<em>New v. Kroeger</em> (2009) 167 Cal.App.4th 800, 815.) In a hierarchical church, an individual local congregation that affiliates with the national church body becomes a member of a much larger and more important religious organization, under its government and control, and bound by its orders and judgments. In contrast, a congregational church is defined as one strictly independent of other ecclesiastical associations, and one that so far as church government is concerned, owes no fealty or obligation to any higher authority. (<em>Id</em>. at p. 816.)<br /><br />Defendants dispute that the Episcopal Church is a hierarchical church, but both the California Supreme Court in <em>In Re: Episcopal Church Cases</em> and the appellate court in <em>New v. Kroeger</em> found it to be so. (<em>In Re: Episcopal Church Cases, supra,</em> 45 Cal.4th at p. 494; <em>New v. Kroeger, supra,</em> 167 Cal.App.4th 816- 817.) A review of the Constitution and Canons of the Church indicates that it is indeed hierarchical.<br /><br />The Episcopal Church’s Constitution provides for the establishment of a General Convention composed of two houses, the House of Bishops and the House of Deputies, each with the right to originate and propose legislation. (Mullin Decl. Exhibit 1, Constitution of Episcopal Church Article I, Sec. 1.) Among the duties of the General Convention is the enactment and amendment of the Canons. (See Mullin Decl. Exhibit 1, Canons of Episcopal Church Title 1, Canon 1, sec. (2(n)(3), Title V, Canon 1, Sec.1.) The General Convention approves and consents to the admission of new dioceses and the election of new bishops. (Mullin Decl. Exhibit 1, Constitution of Episcopal Church Article II, Sec. 2, Article V, Sec. 1.) New dioceses must express "unqualified accession to the Constitution and Canons" before they can be in union with the general convention and admitted to the Episcopal Church. (Mullin Decl. Exhibit 1, Constitution of Episcopal Church Article V, Sec. 1.)<br /><br />Defendant’s attempt to dispute the hierarchical nature of the Episcopal Church with the declaration of Rev. Wantland is unavailing. His declaration as to the nature of the Church is an inadmissible opinion on a legal conclusion. "[It] is thoroughly established that experts may not give opinions on matters which are essentially within the province of the court to decide." (<em>Carter v. City of Los Angeles</em> (1945) 67 Cal.App.2d 524, 528.)<br /><br /><em>Lamb is the Incumbent of the Corporation Sole</em><br /><br />Corporations Code section 10002 provides: "A corporation sole may be formed under this part by the bishop, chief priest, presiding elder, or other presiding officer of any religious denomination, society, or church, for the purpose of administering and managing the affairs, property, and temporalities thereof." "Historically, a corporation sole consists of one person only and his successors, in some particular station, who are incorporated by law in order to give them legal capacities and advantages, particularly that of perpetuity, which in their natural persons they could not have." (<em>Estate of Zabriskie</em> (1979) 96 Cal.App.3d 571, 576-577.) Religious corporations are merely "permitted as a convenience to assist in the conduct of the temporalities of the church. Notwithstanding incorporation the ecclesiastical body is still all-important. The corporation is a subordinate factor in the life and purposes of the church proper." (<em>Wheelock v. First Presb. Church</em> (1897) 119 Cal. 477, 483.)<br /><br />"The Protestant Episcopal Bishop of San Joaquin, a Corporation Sole" was created to hold title to property belonging to the Missionary District and, later, Diocese of San Joaquin. (UMF Nos. 23, 28, 34.) The Corporations initial articles stated that it was formed because "the rules and regulations of the Protestant Church in the Missionary District of San Joaquin … require that the bishop of said Missionary District shall become a corporation sole under the laws of the State of California by the title of The Protestant Episcopal Bishop of San Joaquin for the distraction of the temporalities thereof and the management of the state and property thereof." (UMF No. 23.) When the Missionary District became a Diocese, Cannon XVII (sections 411 and 412) continued to require the Bishop to be a corporation sole "by the title of ‘The Protestant Episcopal Bishop of San Joaquin, a Corporation Sole’ " and to hold title to "[t]rust funds and real estate acquired by gift or purchase for the use of the Diocese of San Joaquin, or for any unincorporated parish therein, or for the use of the Protestant Episcopal Church in any place within this Diocese where there is no organized congregation." (UMF No. 34.)<br /><br />The documents are clear. Only the "Bishop" of the Diocese of San Joaquin has the right to the incumbency of the corporation originally entitled "The Protestant Episcopal Bishop of San Joaquin, a Corporation Sole" and given the number C0066488 by the Secretary of State. Moreover, the Episcopal Church has spoken as to who holds the position of Bishop of the Diocese of San Joaquin – Reverend Lamb. Defendants challenge Lamb’s election as Bishop on procedural grounds such as notice and quorum, but this court has no power to rule on the validity of the Episcopal Church’s election of its Bishops.<br /><br />Both the United States Supreme Court and California courts have held that in the case of hierarchical religious entities the civil courts must accept as binding and defer to decisions by religious tribunals with respect to religious doctrine, practice, faith, ecclesiastical rule, discipline, custom, law, membership, polity, clergy credentials and discipline, as well as religious entity governance and administration.. (<em>Jones v. Wolf</em> (1979) 443 U.S. 595, 602, 603-604; <em>Concord Christian Center v. Open Bible Standard Churches</em> (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 1396, 1411; <em>Serbian Orthodox Diocese v. Milivojevich</em> (1976) 426 U.S. 696, 708–709, 713; <em>Presbyterian Church v. Hull Church</em> (1969) 393 U.S. 440, 449; <em>Rosicrucian Fellow. v. Rosicrucian Etc. Ch.</em> (1952) 39 Cal.2d 121, 131–132.)<br /><br />Accordingly since the Episcopal Church has seen fit to recognize Lamb as the new Bishop of the Diocese of San Joaquin, we must do so as well. (See UMF No. 66 -- Undisputed that Lamb has been asked to consent to the ordination of new bishops, performed baptisms and confirmations, attended the 2008 meeting of the house of bishops as the Bishop of San Joaquin and attended the 2008 Lambeth Conference of Bishops as the Bishop of San Joaquin.) Moreover, the Episcopal Church has deposed Schofield as Bishop. (UMF No. 55.)<br /><br />Defendants contend that there was no proper notice of the March 29, 2008 special convention at which Lamb was elected. It is true that there is no competent evidence that 30 days notice of the meeting was given. Hall’s declaration only establishes that he received the notice on March 2, 2008. (Decl. Hall ¶ 20; Exhibit 9.) He did not mail the notice. It is undated. Defendants also contend that the deposition of Schofield was contrary to Church policy, procedure and law. However, we may not look into the prosperity of the election and deposition of church officers according to church regulations and rules. (<em>Serbian Orthodox, supra</em>, 426 U.S. at pp. 708-709; <em>Maxwell v. Brougher</em> (1950) 99 Cal.App.2d 824, 826; see <em>Vukovich v. Radulovich</em> (1991) 235 Cal.App.3d 281, 292–293]; <em>Higgins v. Maher</em> (1989) 210 Cal.App.3d 1168, 1173.)<br /><br /><em>Lamb is the President of the Episcopal Foundation and Investment Trust</em><br /><br />Diocesan Canon XXVII, section 28.02 states that the "Bishop of the Diocese shall serve as President and Chairman of the Board" of the Episcopal Foundation. (UMF No. 35.)<br /><br />The Investment Trust’s articles of incorporation provide that the Bishop of the Diocese of San Joaquin "shall be ex officio president of the Board of Trustees." (UMF No. 36.)<br /><br />Therefore, Lamb holds both these offices.<br /><br /><em>The Amendment of the Articles of Incorporation in 2006 and 2008 Are Void<br /></em><br />On March 21, 2006 Schofield filed amendments to the articles of incorporation that removed references that before a new bishop could be ordained, consent from the majority of Diocesan Bishops and Standing Committees of the Episcopal Church must be obtained and the bishop must be consecrated by three Episcopal bishops. (UMF No. 41.) This amendment was void because it violated the accession clause and was thus not in conformity with the "rules, regulations or laws" of the Episcopal Church. (See Corp. Code, § 10003.) Moreover, when amending the articles of incorporation of a corporation sole, the incumbent must "sign and verify a statement setting forth the provisions of the amendment and stating that it has been duly authorized by the religious organization governed by the corporation." (Corp. Code, § 10010.) Because the amendment was in direct contravention of the Constitution and Canons of the Episcopal Church at the time it was made, the accession clause prevented the Diocese from "duly authorizing" it.<br /><br />The 2008 amendment changing the name of the corporation to "The Anglican Bishop of San Joaquin" is likewise void. The Diocese of San Joaquin had not "duly authorized" the name change when it occurred. The only purported authorization came about after Schofield was deposed as a Bishop and the Anglican defendants were no longer recognized by the Episcopal Church as the Diocese of San Joaquin.<br /><br /><em>The Diocese is Properly a Party Plaintiff</em><br /><br />Defendants contend that the Diocese of San Joaquin, by which they mean the Anglican Diocese of San Joaquin, has not been joined as a party and judgment may not be had unless it is joined because the declaratory relief action seeks to invalidate its acts.<br /><br />There are two problems with this line of reasoning. First, it ignores the fact that the Episcopal Church has, rightly or wrongly, procedurally correctly or not, recognized the organization headed by Lamb as the true and surviving Diocese of San Joaquin. (See UMF Nos. 55, 57-59, 66.) That Diocese is a party plaintiff.<br /><br />Second, this is not a breach of contract action as defendants suggest in their memorandum of points and authorities. The Diocese is not being sued for breaching a contract with the Church. Although the rule regarding necessary parties is not relaxed in actions brought to obtain declaratory relief, the Diocese is not a necessary party. (See <em>Lloyd v. County of Los Angeles</em> (1940) 41 Cal.App.2d 808, 812.) No judgment or order against the Diocese directing them to pay or do anything is sought. Rather, Schofield is being sued for declaratory relief for his actions in amending the articles of incorporation of the corporation sole and in refusing to give up the incumbency of three corporations.<br /><br /><em>The Corporation Sole is a Party Plaintiff</em><br /><br />Defendants claim that the corporation sole which is a party plaintiff is not the true corporation sole known as No. C0066488 which they claim to operate. Defendants are incorrect for the reasons expressed above. The Diocese of San Joaquin (plaintiffs) is not a new organization that "split off" from defendants’ older organization. It is the older organization from which defendants’ removed themselves.<br /><br /><em>Plaintiffs Have Standing to Sue</em><br /><br />Defendants’ arguments that plaintiffs are not validly constituted as the Diocese and Bishop of the Diocese of San Joaquin, or indeed of any subpart of the Episcopal Church are poorly taken. The defendants have voted to leave an organization that held certain real property and no longer have any claim to it.<br /><br />" 'Ultra vires' refers to an act which is beyond the powers conferred upon a corporation by its charter or by the laws of the state of incorporation . . . ." (<em>Marsili v. Pacific Gas & Elec. Co.</em> (1975) 51 Cal. App. 3d 313, 322.) Defendants argue that their right to amend their constitution and canons has always been unrestricted and unlimited. It is not. From the inception of the Diocese as a Missionary District, it acceded to the Constitution of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America and recognized the authority of the General Convention of the same. (Mullin Decl. Exhibit 7, Constitution of Missionary District of San Joaquin, Article II.) When the Missionary District Petitioned to become a Diocese in 1961, the petition clearly stated in conclusion, "As evidenced by the resolution of the Special Convocation above referred to, the Church in the Missionary District of San Joaquin has acceded to the Constitution and Canons for the Government of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America." (Mullin Decl. Exhibit 9, Petition and Memorial of Missionary District of San Joaquin.) The Constitution of the new Diocese of San Joaquin likewise acceded to the Constitution of the Episcopal Church and recognized the authority of the General Convention. (Mullin Decl. Exhibit 11, Constitution of Diocese of San Joaquin, Article II.)<br /><br />Although defendants make much over the fact that the Diocese acceded only to the Constitution, and not the Canons of the Episcopal Church, the court finds that the Diocese implicitly acceded to both by virtue to acceding to the Constitution. The function of the Constitution is to form a legislative body, the General Convention. The General Convention adopted and amends the Canons. Acceding to the Constitution that creates the legislative body, and recognizing the authority of the legislative body, while simultaneously denying accession to the product of the legislative body is nonsensical. By analogy, a state could accede to the Constitution of the United States and claim that it did not accede to the federal law or the decisions of the United States Supreme Court. Moreover, the Petition for the Erection of the Diocese of San Joaquin mentions accession to both the Constitution and Canons. This strongly implies that it was always the intention of the Diocese to accede to both documents. (See <em>In re Episcopal Church Cases, supra,</em> 45 Cal.4th at pp. 488.) Finally, the Constitution of the Episcopal Church in place in 1961 required accession to both the Constitution and Canons. (Mullin Decl. Exhibit 8, Constitution of Episcopal Church, Article VI.)<br /><br />Accordingly, the 2008 amendments to the Diocese’s Constitution purporting to strike the accession clause and insert new language relative to joining the Province of the Southern Cone were ultra vires and void.<br /><br />The constitution of the Diocese has always permitted amendments. (AMF No. 69, Kamai Decl. Exhibits 4 and 7 Constitution of Diocese of San Joaquin, Article XIII.) Defendants contend that there was no legal impediment to their 2006 amendment qualifying the accession clause such that they acceded to the Episcopal Church’s Constitution only to the extent that it was not inconsistent with the Constitution and Canons of the Diocese, as amended from time to time and further this 2006 amendment allowed for the 2008 amendment deleting the accession clause entirely and withdrawing from the Episcopal Church. Defendants are incorrect. The original accession clause itself prevents such amendment. If the Constitution of the Diocese incorporates and accedes to the Constitution and Canons of the Episcopal Church, which require accession, then the Constitution of the Diocese cannot be amended to remove such language.<br /><br />Defendants also attack the special meeting at which Lamb was elected Bishop, claiming that the calling of the special meeting was not in accordance with the Constitutions and canons of either the Episcopal Church or the Diocese of San Joaquin. Again, the Episcopal Church having seen fit to recognize Lamb as the true Bishop of the Diocese of San Joaquin, this court is without the power to countermand that decision. Defendants cite <em>Singh v. Singh</em> (2004) 114 Cal.App.4th 1264, 1283 for the proposition that a court has jurisdiction to review whether a religious corporation adhered to its own internal rules and bylaws. Singh is distinguishable. In that case an orally elected board of directors sued for judicial determination of the validity of their election or to order a new election and determine the rights of the members to vote, pursuant to Corporations Code section 9418, subdivision (c). The appellate court determined that the trial court, under neutral principles of law could validly interpret the bylaws of the corporation as it applied to the election of a board of directors and their term of office. It did not decide a matter of who was the ecclesiastical authority of the church.<br /><br /><em>Trust Beneficiaries Need Not Be Named or Noticed</em><br /><br />Defendants claim that because this action is to remove Schofield from his position as incumbent of a corporation that holds property in trust for unincorporated missions and parishes, these beneficiaries are necessary parties and are required to be given notice of this action by virtue of Probate Code section 17203. Probate Code section 17203 applies only to proceedings under the probate code applicable to express trusts. The interest at stake here is incumbency in a corporation sole. The fact that the corporation sole holds property in trust does not mean that a petition for the removal of a trustee pursuant to Probate Code section 17200 has been filed.<br /><br /><em>Procedural Issues</em><br /><br />Defendants claim that the motion must be denied because plaintiffs have failed to comply with Rule of Court 3.150 which requires that the specific cause of action must be stated specifically in the notice of motion and be repeated, verbatim in the separate statement of undisputed material facts. Specifically, plaintiff’s notice of motion and separate statement seek summary adjudication on "Count I" not the "First Cause of Action." This distinction is immaterial. As Weil and Brown note, that although few lawyers and judges use the term "count," the term may be used interchangeably with the phrase "cause of action." (Weil & Brown, <em>Civil Procedure Before Trial</em> (The Rutter Group 2008) "Pleadings" § 6:105-6:106.)<br /><br />Defendants also take issue with the separate statement’s failure to place the supporting facts in the first column underneath the supported fact. (Rule of Court, Rule 3.1350, subdivision (d)) and failure to place all supporting evidence under one separate cover separately bound with a table of contents. (Rule of Court, Rule 3.1350, subdivision (g).) However, these minor technical violations did not impede the court’s review of the motion and are not grounds to deny the motion.<br /><br />Defendants contend that because the first cause of action is broken into subparts seeking declaratory relief on several issues, each issue had to be separately identified in the separate statement of facts in support of summary judgment and the separate statement organized so that it could be determined which fact related to each issue. Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (f)(1), provides: "A party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, one or more affirmative defenses, one or more claims for damages [as specified in Section 3294 of the Civil Code], or one or more issues of duty . . . . A motion for summary adjudication shall be granted only if it completely disposes of a cause of action, an affirmative defense, a claim for damages, or an issue of duty." As such the cause of action for declaratory relief stands or fails as a whole and the plaintiffs were not required to break the separate statement into sub "issues" for adjudication, as this would have been improper.<br /><br />Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312, subd. (a) and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subd. (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.<br /><br /><strong>Tentative Ruling</strong><br /><br /><strong>Issued By:<u> AMC on May 4, 2009 .</u></strong><br />(Judge’s Initial) (Date) </div>Bill Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07299456393520253279noreply@blogger.com0